I think I found a solution.
Past Autumn I borrowed 430 and 460 Slake MDM masts, both medium base and medium top, which translates in a 27.5/63/77 for the 460.
Despite specs are supposed to be totally wrong for my '22 S2Maui Venom sails, at "dry" checking (unfortunately I was not able to test on the water) the cambers rotation was a breeze.
This confirmed to me that the reduced diameter in the first 2 cams section leads to better flex and therefore gets rid of the "stuck cams".
In the end, I had an MDM 460 mast manufactured by an Italian supplier. This one is theorically "even worse" by specs than the Slake, being designed as a 62/77. Rotation resulted just fine, shape not perfect (too much slack in the sleeve under the boom), by the way, I added two shims at camber #2 (meaning sanding the cams is NOT the solution).
Here are a couple of brief, ugly vids where you can check cam rotation and sail shape. Venom '22 set as per specs, mast "italian" MDM 460/25/62/77, 2 shims added at cam #2.
So, in the end, my advice is as follows:
if you have cam rotation issues, get an MDM mast.
If you live in Australia or New Zealand probably your best solution is to get a Slake MDM mast. If you live in Europe, where Slake prices are out of question, you can contact me and I can get you the same mast rigged in the 7.5 you see here, or, even better, if we put together a decent order (ask your friends!) we can even have masts manufactured to different specs (a 460/25/63/77 would make for same or better rotation and better sail shape, plus would work nicely with practically every other sail brand on the market - apart from NP).
Otherwise as you see the MDM 460/25/62/77 already behaves much, much better then the original Venom 460.
If you fear that an MDM mast would be too wobbly for a cambered race sail, please consider that the diameter difference is mostly due to recent SDM masts having a "drop" or "bottleneck" shape in the lower sections (up to 60 - 80 cms), from there up it's practically same diameter SDMs and MDMs, and you can judge and decide by yourself how much an effect that smaller (by a mere
6 mm) diameter in the lowest part of the mast may have on rig behaviour on the water.
?si=55dbdc2DQxZmBpcf
?si=EHmvkshsbjGi3jJb