Back to top

Quiver Question

Created by joe windsurf joe windsurf  > 9 months ago, 19 Feb 2012
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
joe windsurf
joe windsurf

1482 posts

19 Feb 2012 9:52pm
as a heavyweight (100+kilos), in a typically light wind area (Montreal), my boards and sails tend to be large.
My boards are Fanatic Ultra CAT longboard, AHD FF 160 liter/79 cm and Fanatic BEE LTD 124/63 cm.
My current sails are MS TR-4 10-oh, MS-2 8-oh, Gaastra Flow 3X 7-oh and an old Simmer WCR 6-oh. {MS = MauiSails :-)} All these sails are cambered...
I used to have a MS Pursuit 8.5 with NO cams and liked it...It was replaced with the MS-2 8-oh.
Last summer I used the 7-oh about 5 times - and the BEE even less.
It is still a very good sail and it fits well on the 490/75 MS mast.

Please be patient , I am getting to the question. :-)

When I look at the numbers , it seems 10-oh,8-oh, 6.4 and 5.1 are a perfect set mathematically.
If I barely use a 7-oh, why would I get a 6.4 ? NOTE: last summer was NOT typical - usually get SOME good winds.
I was hoping to replace the 7-oh instead one day - with an MS Switch.
My issue is money. It would require a mast as well.
Does it make more sense to replace the 7-oh when it dies or invest in a 6.4 now/eventually ?
Which is the better quiver since we do have light wind summers:10-8-7-6 OR 10-8-6.4-5.1 ?

thanx in advance
Mark _australia
Mark _australia

WA

23526 posts

19 Feb 2012 10:05pm
Bigger sails = bigger gaps. So the best quiver is your second example starting at 5.1, as the gaps get progressively larger.

Unless you'd never use 5.1 ......

But can you please write 7.0 not 7-oh it is driving me mad
Stuthepirate
Stuthepirate

SA

3591 posts

20 Feb 2012 1:02am
Oh, I don't Knoh
joe windsurf
joe windsurf

1482 posts

20 Feb 2012 9:26am
Select to expand quote
Mark _australia said...
But can you please write 7.0 not 7-oh it is driving me mad


no butts about it

the 5.1 would be way down the road anyway
End of posts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site