Back to top

Difference between 2015 - 2016 NP Masts

Created by beerinmind1 beerinmind1  > 9 months ago, 24 Jul 2016
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
beerinmind1
beerinmind1

1 posts

24 Jul 2016 9:28am
hi guys ,


im looking at investing in a new mast or 2. I'm currently using a NP x35 430 with 2016 Ryde 6.5 and 7.5 (sets like s##t on the 430 cant get enough down haul). the x35 is starting to look tired and I want to avoid a mast break and long swim if I can, so it's time to invest. being relatively to the sport I'm still learning about gear etc, so I have a few questions

are there any advantages aside from weight when you go to higher carbon content masts ?

I'm just wondering if anyone knows what the difference is between NP 2015 FX100 and the 2016 FLX100 ?

all I can see is different paint job, 2016 is .05kg heavier and price. Is there anything to justify the extra $$ aside from being able to say I have the latest model ?

and finally carbon booms , are they worth the extra $ ? And is there any brands that are over rated, over priced Or poor quality?


BSN101
BSN101

WA

2378 posts

25 Jul 2016 3:02pm
Hi Beerinmind,

I use NP FX100 RDM 430 on 5.5 & 6.5 and NP FX100 SDM 460 on my 7.5.

Im real happy with the RDM , probably because i prefer the 5.5 & 6.5 size but have had good enough experience with the 7.5 on my RB in light winds.

I am not aware of any differences between FX & FLX masts.

NP have out sourced masts for 2017 tho.

I have a carbon enigma boom but have not used it enough to form an opinion.

Cheers Dave
Pete T
Pete T

WA

67 posts

25 Jul 2016 4:49pm
Hi Beerinmind,

No change to the NP masts, I set the 7.5 Ryde on an old FX1000 works well nice and light and heaps of range.

Pete
Faff
Faff

VIC

1394 posts

25 Jul 2016 8:43pm
According to the unifibre site, NP seems to have the most consistent bend curves year in year out. I don't see why they'd change now.
End of posts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site