Select to expand quote
joe87879 said..
180lbs & sail in freshwater.
Joe
Mind the words of windgenuity above. Low flying speed doesn't necessarily meant super early take off in low wind. Big, lifty foils are also draggy. If you were 200+ , I think the extra lift would start to be more important which is why Heliboy999 found it useful.
translated from Glissattitude:
marseille.glissattitude.com/blog/windfoil-test-stb-gt-alu.html"Takeoff speed or mini wind?I take advantage of this topic to discuss an important point about takeoff capabilities in the light wind.The first infancy of foil (4 to 6 years ago) was with models based on large, thick, wide wings. The objective was to manage a high lift even with little float speed.Evolution is allowed to go to thinner and less wide wings to promote sliding and sensations. By dragging less water, it was found that the foil was allowed to take speed faster, and to go towards a better longitudinal stability. A smaller wing also avoids getting out of the water at all times. It was especially noticed that the big wings did not allow to sail with less wind.Indeed, ultra-strong wings will take off the float with very little movement speed, but as they drag much more water, they require at least as much wind as a wing finer.Manufacturers have realized that everyone was looking to glide in very little wind, they begin to offer huge wings. If they may have an interest in initiation (first take-offs), do not think they will allow you to hover with 5 knt of wind ... it's a sight of the spirit. In contrast, the range of use of wings will be lower."
iirc, they've mentioned elsewhere that they didn't really find the 1100 freeride wing to foil much if any earlier than the 800 because of this. The new 1000 is very efficient, like the 800, so does offer earlier lift off.
An efficient race/free race wing and foil from 900-1200cm will begin to accelerate once clear of the water in a way that a draggier foil can't and benefits from the increased apparent wind.