Select to expand quote
WhiteofHeart said..
Distance between your backstrap & mastbase is the total distance you can vary your weight across. The wider this is the more stable, the smaller the more manouvrable (or unstable). I'd personally for a race / freerace setup go with the footstraps back and compensate with the mastfoot, as that allows for a wider setup overal e.g. more stability.
I am not totally convinced, but maybe I am wrong?
When You have a wide setup (mastfoot more to the front, straps back) then every small movement of the body has a great impact on the trim, because the leverage is high.
With a narrower setup (mastbase more to the back, straps forward) small movements (weight shifting to the front or back) has less impact on the board trim.
So what is more stable?
Beside that the shim on the stabilizer also effects board trim al lot. You can use more lift on the stabilizer and compensate with mastfoot/straps more forward or less lift on the stabilizer and mastfoot/straps more to the back.
I would start like this:
- mastbase in the middle (depending on the board but normally around 108 to 110 cm from the front screw of the foil on slalom boards). Extreme mastbase positions also effect the stance of the sail, for example if the mastbase is very far forward, You will rake the sail more back, with the lower leech touching the board (close the gap), what is not really recommmended in foiling.
- backwing shim for the stabilizer that is usual (common sense) for Your foil (look at settings here in the forum, what are used by most of the riders, or what is recommended by the foil manufacturer))
- then place the straps, so that You get a stable setup
This is the basic setup!
- then fine tune from there with different mastbase and shim settings, boom height and sail trim (downhaul, outhaul). There are many things to try, so it can take time to find a perfect setup!