I was going to post a few comments on and about a previous thread
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/Foiling/Windsurfing-Foiling-2018?page=9 .
This thread is now closed, so I'll do it now because this issue is by no means settled and also because it has recent and misleading ramifications on a French thread that feeds on the same hearsay (
www.windsurfing33.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=113208&sid=bf7a25af10697016cac2375d46c543bc&start=15) . They openly refer to Seabreeze in their comments.
The focus of the remarks ( and of the attacks ) on the previous thread was a certain XYZ defending the FRP Gear minifoils on the strength of his own experience,
Sadly, neither the tone nor the contents of the arguments raised in that thread against these minifoils went beyond raw innuendos and cheap personal attacks against XYZ, with nobody citing his own personal experience to corroborate the negative comments.
True , in iWindsurf for instance, one of my favorite Forums along with Seabreeze, there are , to be sure, a few positive reviews based on personal experience, but they are conveniently ignored by many in the community , either because they doggedly stick to preconceived ideas. or because there are commercial interests involved and those who post negative comments may do so just because they have an axe to grind. ..( manufacturers, too, have their antennas on Forums, as a source of precious information. No wonder if they try to steer the windsurfers' opinions against possible (and cheaper ) competitors.
Kind of vicious circle. Probably very few bought (or tried) these minifoils, just because the " others" say that hey are not good ..The bad reputation keeps feeding and gaining strength on mere hearsay.
When I speak of "cheap" remarks, I really mean it: some on that thread went as far as insinuating that XYZ or the owner of FRP ( whom they suspect of being the same Russian individual behind FRP ) don't really have a PhD in engineering .
The contention was also made that , even if the supporters had a PhD , it would be irrelevant, because for them what really counts is experience in windsurfing..
Really? Theory and practice are intertwined : we certainly need a good mechanic to fix our car, but only an engineer can design its engine and improve its performance.
XYZ is also suspected of hiding a vested interest in selling the minifoils, hence he would be making misleading, if not false, claims, in order to push the sales.
It was perhaps inappropriate that XYZ should insinuate that Robby Naish faked the wind-speed in his videos, but he, too, has a vested interest in selling his product,, after all, yet nobody doubts his reliability and good faith. One weight too measures!
Come on, guys! Those who, like me are interested in these minifoils need much more than underhand innuendos or personal attacks against those who go against conventional wisdom. if they are to to be convinced that these fly foils are ineffective and a waste of money. They might well be so, but I need to have a consistent negative feed-back from people who have tried them and not just heard about them. which so far has not been the case.
Until then, the comments made by some windsurfers on this issue , on this platform or elsewhere, are not far from the arguments made in ages past by those who contended that the Earth cannot be round, because if you lay a spherical object like a ball on a perfectly flat surface, you see, it doesn't roll away.....
Before concluding, lest somebody think that I am a Russian just trying to defend two fellow country-men, let me say that I am not Russian, but Italian, born and raised there, but now living in North America.
Francone