Thanks everyone for your interest!
Thedoor, see the diagram below. In the top picture above, look on the shelf and you will see two cross section test samples of hollow construction. The core on those test samples is way to thin. I will likely use 1/2" to 3/4" core, it depends on what I can scrounge up from local composite shops. I have a lead on some nomex honeycomb locally!
Segler, yeah Patrick has a line of hollow boards called air inside. Thanks for the link to Doyle. This is not a new idea just a way to get the weight out of high volume shapes. It is too exspensive to be profitable for most boards and builders. The high volume pro racing windfoil boards are a good use of this technique. I am doing it because I have always wanted to.
Swoosh, as you have learned by now you never want to touch down, ever, period the end. There is not much a boards shape is going to do that will overcome the decelerations involved. For me the interest in bevels comes from looking at the boards on the wing and surf foiling side of things. Put simply a flat bottom doesn't want to release. I have a SUP with a handle on deck and it is impossible to pick it straight of the water, I have to tilt it over to brake the surface tension. Windfoiling is different than windsurfing, the boards should be different. I prefer to ride with more wing and less sail. With a high lift wing and pumping I am free and flying before planning speeds. Thats why I want to explore a shape that has less drag below take off speeds. This shape has 15% less wetted surface than my last shape and the tail kick with a narrower tail approximates the shape of a sailboat hull and will tow less of a wake behind it. Moving the foil forwards allows for a tapered tail because the riders weight stays forward. I know this shape will fly sooner and easier but it may be worse in touch downs because of all the curves. I am deliberately building to very different shapes to help wade through all the conflicting marketing information.