Back to top

easy paddling board

Created by surfsky surfsky  > 9 months ago, 16 Apr 2009
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
surfsky
surfsky

NSW

68 posts

16 Apr 2009 4:17pm
hey...just turned 42 and been riding 6'1 by 18 by 2 1/2 boards till now but am getting fn stuffed paddling it....need a good paddler that is loose and high performance...what are you guys riding that will fit the bill
cheers tj
Tux
Tux

Tux

VIC

3829 posts

16 Apr 2009 5:41pm
Mate I'm 32 and I ride a 6'6 by 21 1/2" x 2 3/8" single to double concave rounded pin for the 0-4ft days and 7'0 x 21 1/2 x 2 3/8" single to double rtounded square for the 6 - 10 ft days....ones a Full Circle from Phillip Island (forgot the shapers name) and the other in by Ringa of Ilsand surfboards....both are sweet...have also got good reports from mates on Mark Phipps Kong Model boards
cRAZY Canuk
cRAZY Canuk

NSW

2528 posts

16 Apr 2009 6:16pm
One thought is to try going up in thickness - adds more bouyance per cm³ over the length of the board than just adding length

Than again I'm 100kg and don't have anything under 6'10" in the rack - too much hassle
surfsky
surfsky

NSW

68 posts

16 Apr 2009 6:36pm
hey tux....does the 21 1/2 make a big difference to the handling of the board
spot1
spot1

WA

1588 posts

16 Apr 2009 5:00pm
lose 10 kg
surfsky
surfsky

NSW

68 posts

16 Apr 2009 8:21pm
wtf spot
only weigh 70 kg.....
62mac
62mac

WA

24860 posts

16 Apr 2009 6:31pm
Select to expand quote
spot1 said...

lose 10 kg


lol
As cRAZY said add a little thickness,keep the same diminsions,this will give you more paddling power!
Tux
Tux

Tux

VIC

3829 posts

17 Apr 2009 11:31am
Select to expand quote
surfsky said...

hey tux....does the 21 1/2 make a big difference to the handling of the board



Nah mate...I prefer adding width instead of thickness..I used to ride 18 1/2"'s by 2 3/4".....width is heaps better than thickness you get a better rail shap IMO without rolling the deck out too much...Derek Hynd wrote a fantatstic article about this sort of stuff in Surfer about ten years ago...bottom contours on wider boards are super important as well....

spot1
spot1

WA

1588 posts

17 Apr 2009 2:00pm
if you only 70kg getting a thicker longer wider board will be hard to duck dive
harder to set the rail in
do some swimming get your fittness up
DL
DL

DL

WA

659 posts

17 Apr 2009 4:45pm
fish!
surfsky
surfsky

NSW

68 posts

17 Apr 2009 9:41pm
cheers tux....thats what i was after.... jeezz spot your a hard bastard...im just getting old
theDoctor
theDoctor

NSW

5786 posts

17 Apr 2009 10:50pm
tux is on the money, wider before thicker everytime...

18" is a way narrow board, you could go out to easily 19-1/2" without destroying plane shape and still keep your percieved performance, i reckon you'll blow out at how stable and forgiving it would become and would be that much easier to paddle, that all thoughts you've been having about giving up on real surfing and buying a mal would instantly evaporate.

as DL says a fish would probably be even better (or you could really hate your self and go epoxy, those things paddle better to comparable poly in size)
beastsurf
beastsurf

WA

902 posts

18 Apr 2009 10:22am
Hey surfsky if you havent compromised on performance in the past i wouldn't start now. maybe try 2 5/8s thick keep under 19 inches wide and push it out to 6foot 3 inches try a slightly wider square or swallow. Paddle power comes from the shoulders and core yoga good food.

Spray it red It'll go faster.
cRAZY Canuk
cRAZY Canuk

NSW

2528 posts

18 Apr 2009 3:06pm
Select to expand quote
theDoctor said...
as DL says a fish would probably be even better (or you could really hate your self and go epoxy, those things paddle better to comparable poly in size)


Retro single fin....... come on any takers bar me?

I found a guy on the Northern Beaches that does Custom EPS/epoxy boards - died and went to heaven
End of posts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site