Select to expand quote
rbl said...
Suba correct me if wrong aren't u being educated by the punters at the uni that clearly are making themselves look as though they are behind the 8 ball
Thing is ALOT of time goes into research before we can say something is definite and even then there is a greater chance of it being refuted by other researchers around the world. This is possibly why it takes so long for anything to happen in re: research on our grey suited mates. Even worse is how modern society wants a quick fix for everything but sometimes that may not be the best thing.
Suba's right in that years ago we didn't have the technology etc that we do now which has allowed us to become more aware of our surroundings and the sharks swimming underneath us. Furthermore there is definitely more people in the water now than compared to years before increasing the chances of a curious bite here and there. On a side note it is interesting to note that in a certain popular surf spot in an Indo bay, there are plentiful sharks (up to 5m as a local had put it) but never any attacks due to plentiful fish stocks around (?).
The most important thing though is finding a happy medium rather than blatantly going off and shooting everything with a fin and sharp teeth or ignoring the facts of more and more people jumping in the water these days. We need people like Dave (as read before) being funded and supported in their pursuits of 'anti-shark' devices than political witch hunts which seem to be the case of aussie governments these days.
I'm not here to have a go at anyone or refute anything. I just loved surfing mettams especially on a big day when the swell kicked in. It'd be such a fun/ forgiving wave. Have had the days though when I was the only one out and it indeed felt sharky to the point of making friends with whoever ventured out - longboarders, sup'ers or lidders regardless