Back to top

what size

Created by suface2air suface2air  > 9 months ago, 3 Apr 2012
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
suface2air
suface2air

QLD

701 posts

3 Apr 2012 9:24am
yer you probley heard it before . I am 65 kgs 172 high and wanting to surf in 2-3 foot buby waves not sure on a size would a 7- 8 ft min mal suit or would i need bigger . Lets refaze a bit i cant paddel surf to well yet neither i userly use a kite to tow in . Yep i am from the other side looking for a different advanture .
Ted the Kiwi
Ted the Kiwi

NSW

14256 posts

3 Apr 2012 11:01am
My thoughts are that if you are just starting out surfing and will only be hitting the small stuff get yourself a nice big board to start with - volume is your friend. You will progress faster and have a lot more fun. Mini Mals are rubbish in my opinion and should be avoided by most. They are just as much hassle as a bigger board (re storrage, transporting and weight) compared to a short board yet pooh all over them in practise.

As you are only a lightweight at 65kg you will not need to go to big on the volume. I would think have a look around for something in the lower 9 foot range. Some others on here can probably give you some more detailed suggestions.

Enjoy and make sure you post some pics of yr new weapon.
MichaelR
MichaelR

NSW

862 posts

3 Apr 2012 1:53pm
Because my memory of learning is quite fresh in my mind, I can agree with Ted. Stay away from Mini-Mals, even if you're on the lighter side.

Go find a good condition 9' to 9'6 longboard, with somewhere close to 3" thickness.

I tried exactly what you're planning, and it took me so much time to just catch a wave, let alone stand up. As soon as I had something that paddled well, and was reasonably stable, my surfing improved dramatically.

Michael
62mac
62mac

WA

24860 posts

3 Apr 2012 11:58am
Ask Pup 8 foot or 906
suface2air
suface2air

QLD

701 posts

3 Apr 2012 2:13pm
Thanks everyone for thequick replys have now got an idea at least @ ted i will put up a photo hopefully one with me on it (thats if the camera is quick enough ha ha )
Thanks SAM
chrispychru
chrispychru

QLD

7932 posts

3 Apr 2012 5:08pm
Select to expand quote
62mac said...

Ask Pup 8 foot or 906


yes i know mac,i would say 8'ft. is the perfect size(this is a biased opinion and you should agree ok)
62mac
62mac

WA

24860 posts

3 Apr 2012 5:40pm
Select to expand quote
chrispychru said...

62mac said...

Ask Pup 8 foot or 906


yes i know mac,i would say 8'ft. is the perfect size(this is a biased opinion and you should agree ok)


I've seen you do some little skater moves on the 8 before injury.
RMS
RMS

RMS

WA

22 posts

3 Apr 2012 9:52pm
Not much bigger/heavier than you. Got talked into a longboard for Perth's crap waves. True, I could catch anything bigger than a ripple with my 9'6", but not much fun to ride. For the past two years I have exclusively used a 7'10" Channel Islands Waterhog (54 liter). This board catches waves nearly as easily as a mal, but is much more manouverable and responsive. Unlike my 8'0" minimal (standard shape with little rocker and wide in the nose), the "Hog" can generally handle steep take-offs without pearling (nose diving). Also, tuflite construction is exactly that: tough and light. One of the very few items that, in hindsight, I would not hesitate to buy again. In other words, I agree that mini-mals can be crap, but the "Hog" is a different animal all together. May not necessarily work well for you, but it is certainly worth your consideration.
End of posts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site