Select to expand quote
obct said..
From what I can see, the outline is not their biggest problem, a reduction in frontal area and the placing of the wide point where your weight will be when you're trying to move that frontal mass around, is a noble and some would say sensible thought. Their biggest problem as far as I can tell is that most of them are made with really knify rails which makes them dig in hard on turns and require a lot of effort to recover.
the people who ride them tend to adopt a twitchy sort of a style that many people don't find attractive.
A shaper from way way back called Bill Thac......... (sorry, I don't know how to spell his surname) claims that almost every short board since the advent of the thruster is essentially a Pigboard, because it has it wide point back. that for me is an interesting concept because it's no secret that I don't find the flippity floppity circus trick style of short board riding particularly attractive.
Hipsters luv em.
I have also heard the theory that every shortboard is an evolution of the Velzy pig shape - interesting as you say. However with the pig being developed to provide a better 'hotdogging' board I guess it is a suggestion that is plausible.
From my limited insight into these, I like the idea of a reduced size and weight in the front are for a nose rider - reduces the possibility of the front end rail catching. Allowing the wide point further back I would assume would provide more stability and hold in the white wash/suck part of the wave when on the nose. Well that is my understanding.
As far as turning and manoeuvrability - that big @r$e fin would be a hindrance of some sort unless you are right over the tail.
In saying all that - I love the look of them (I am prob the furthest thing from a hipster) and would absolutely love to ride one. If I was cashed up I would splurge on this or even a Bing Feral pig and see how they go - unfortunately I am broke...... AND married......