An example of upright fins with no rake, the fins made by Cheyne Horan:
www.cheynehoran.com.au/fins/
(I used the starfin as a single fin, but alas never tried my EZ3 thruster set, as I had discovered the Quobba and had no motivation anymore to test non-Quobba fins. Plus my EZ3 set was in an awful soft plastic)
Compared to a raked fin:
- they will be more efficient: the raked tip has a long surface, which is hard to foil properly, hence lots of friction and more fin is in a turbulent wake.
- they will engage in the turn more suddenly and frankly
- at the end of the turn, they can feel twitchy, as they lack the "damping" of the raked part that kind of prevent a sudden stall, transitions are more progressive. This was a drawback of the famous "spitfire" fighter places in WWII by the way. This is why they can feel lacking drive: this "twitchyness" can make you oversteer or stall at the end of the turn, killing your speed.
- when you push on them during the turn, their center of resistance is closer to the board (less torque on the ankle) and stays forward. A lot of people like to feel they can leverage on the raked part
My opinion is that they are quite unique - and tricky - to ride as single or twin fins, but the "twichyness" is countered when used as thrusters or quads. The rear fins act as "stabilisers", replacing the role of the rake. This is why you see some quad sets having no rake on the rear fins, what is called a "controller" setup. The rake on the front fin gives you the traditional positive feel underfoot to push on, while the rear fins let the tail loose to make the board more lively.
So, basically, single of twin upright fins not so much lack drive than can feel unpredictable in hairy situations.
I even cut out the raked part of my rear Quobba fins to end up with the best quad setup I ever had: my tail is then so much looser that I can easily put the board on the rail with no latency: