Select to expand quote
chucktheskiffie said..
Helmy have you tried the 17' Bullet?
if so, do you have a comparison?
Can't get an unlimited out of my mind!!!
If Helmy hasn't chimed in in the last hour and a half I seem to have been putting this reply together, here goes.
I have the 17'4" Bullet, and the reason I let the F16 disappear to Helmy's garage is I much prefer it (The 17 that is).
I have had it nearly 5 months, limited downwinders (1 and 1/2) but a lot of general paddling in all conditions, pretty much daily.
When I say limited downwinders, I have probably done more than I think, but I paddle both directions.
It is awesomely stable, really planted in a sea.
In flat water paddled flat out, it feels like it lifts out of the water. The F16 looks like it is surfing on it's own bow wave in the same conditions.
I am hovering around 95kg, Helmy 75kg. I found the F16 a bit less reassuring, but it never misbehaved. I think for a bigger bloke, the 17 is better.
I don't know what initially attracted me to the big boards, but I went from a 29" wide 14' to a less than 27' wide 17'.
The narrower board is way more pleasant to paddle, and with much more board under where you stand, is much more stable.
Have subsequently discovered 14' and 12'6" SIC boards are different to other brands, but that's another story.
Both F16 and 17 Bullet are fast - I spent the last half of Sunday's downwinder on my knees, through lack of ability and fitness, but pretty much kept up.
Early on, it was a bit frightening, nearly throwing me off the back when it got up and surfed.
Could bore you witless with comparison measurements, but basically the 17' Bullet has a single concave for most of it's length, transitioning to a V or slight double concave at the back.
The F16 has a double concave for most of it's length, and a distinct V keel. Rail shape on both is similar at the back, but F16 has harder rails carried further forward.
Plan shape is near enough to identical from back to front until the F16 tapers sooner.
Both are massive volume boards, the 17 more so, particularly towards the front.
F16 looks like it is designed to track straight - straight rails, straight keel. 17 Bullet a bit less so.
Don't believe the difference in length is of any relevance between them - length of swell, wave period etc. Just a different solution to the same question.
F16 looks like it has massive nose rocker, but not much between them. From rough measurements, the amount of rocker is the same, it just gets there a foot and a half sooner.
Disclaimer I know nothing about this, have no technical skills or knowledge, claim no expertise, and if you think I am wrong I probably am.
But have spent a fair bit of time trying to understand these boards.
17' Naish not to be dismissed - very similar in plan profile and rail shape to the F16, much finer nose but plenty of buoyancy up there.
Sentimental favourite.
F16 on the left, "keel" and double concave obvious, 17 Bullet on the right.
Appears to be much more volume up front in the Bullet.
Angle of photo deceptive, the three are not worlds apart
Car roof rocker comparison
Only reason to be on a 14' "race" board is if you want to race.
I don't.
Much prefer a nicely designed board fit for purpose, with no compromises to make it allegedly faster to paddle 200m in conditions that never actually occur in the real world.
GO UNLIMITED!