Select to expand quote
Ocean44 said..
Tell you where my experience with carbon vs fibreglass lies. Fly rods. A high content carbon fly rod is fantastic for casting a long way. They have very limited flex, therefore if you put too much pressure on them they'll snap. (Plenty of snapped paddles on this forum). Low flex but powerful. Whereas fibreglass flexes a lot more, you can't cast as far, but you can bend an 8' rod until the tip touches the butt and it won't snap. For a while to combat this and have the best of both worlds, they made blanks with a helicoil scrim, with a unidirectional carbon overlay. More power and more hoop strength. Better? Well yes and no. The market leaders who invested heavily in high carbon graphite fly rods preach power over subtlety and most blokes will go for power every day of the week. Carbon rods are always lighter too, so if you are fly casting for hours (not usual) it means less fatigue. But if you are like me, I can't see a fly that I cast ranging in size from a mosquito to a very small moth at more than 15 metres. Most fly fishing is done at this distance. Why do we need carbon fly rods? Marketing. Where am I going with this? I'm thinking that a composite paddle will outlast a full carbon paddle, and unless you are fanatical about your gear, a composite paddle should be fine for most people.
Going from fibreglass as a kid to high end carbon rods in my fishing.... there is no way id take a step back!