Select to expand quote
Cp500n said..
It's so so light and easier to balance than the fugu but just doesn't seem to have the same turning ability
Hi Cp500n, nice review!
I think it is also due to the flatter tail rocker. The shape changed in 2022 for a more traditional rocker, you can see the quite obvious difference between my Alleys 8'1": 2022 model (top) and my 2019 (bottom):

The flatter rocker makes its stabler, faster in weak conditions, but less loose in the pocket. Basically the 2019 shape come alive when you have your rear foot well on the arch/kickpad, where the 2022 can tolerate a wider range of placement.
This made me keep the 2019 model. With also its extra lightness (1.5 kg difference) it is a better board for the mellow conditions where you want to generate speed. Nothing beats the "turbo" of a flatter tail rocker when you put your back foot "to the metal" to pinch that extra juice in small waves. The 2022 shines however in more hollow or powerful conditions. Also, as you found out, there is no free lunch, less weight means generally a bit less strength (the 2020 and later have full PVC sandwich also on the bottom and rails). These 2019 are the only Gong carbon boards I had to use rails savers on... but they were the lightest ever produced by them... compromises, compromises.
The 2019 pad had too wide slots, making the pad bits between them too narrow to resist foot movements in the long term. I fixed it by adding some bits of pad in the middle of the slots to reduce their length. Note how on your DK pad on your Karmen, the slots are wider apart... It is a good thing that Gong corrected this afterwards (no issue on my 2022, but I had to re-glue bits of the 2019 pad often), but I must say that I found that round holes are the better solution, like on your Luna.
The Karmen has a wider tail, that can provide too much lift in the size, I suggest you try it as a quad for these conditions, it helps to control the tail then.