Piros said..
Yeah tend to agree all the Sup foil design criteria is going towards the downwind side especially with the production companies BUT the few Sup guys around where I live are still ripping and continually getting custom newer sleeker designers by DC Foils .
Agreed, buddies are ripping locally on SUP foils too. In the right hands, SUP foil can be pretty much as dynamic as prone foil.
For me, I mostly prone and wing, but I sup sometimes too when the conditions are right. I am thinking of building a new sup foil and being a hack, it's easiest to copy a design that works ... looking around I found it interesting that the big companies don't seem to be advertising for sup any more. EG Kalama E3, one version is the skinny downwinder, the other is the wide wing board. Both say "Downwind/sup" and "wing/sup"....but for both SUP is the secondary factor. I quite like the look of the new armstrong, the FG forward geometry thing looks pretty good riding, nice to have the board's weight more evenly distributed, less feet of board to swing around in front. But that one is also "wing/sup", with winging the main goal.
Being honest, I am a little cynical about board designs for foiling. With most of its riding life spent above water, I have doubts how much the tricked out features actually matter. Enough volume to paddle comfortably, stable enough for the conditions you ride, with both size and volume minimized as low as feasible to still be functional....that's 90% of it. My two buddies who are the best at pumping locally, one prone one sup, are doing it on boards that are impossibly big if you believe what you read online. Their performance would be improved with smaller gear ... but fact is they are making it work. Kind of gives some perspective. Especially for the prone board discussions where people are debating merits of 32L vs 34L ... which brings me back to the potato chip surfboard days, hearing people argue about how 1/8" of tail width is wrecking their snaps when they can barely surf. But I digress!