Select to expand quote
baldy123 said..
New Armie Boards look great. The whole track placement issue on production boards is only really solved with longer tracks ie 14 or 16 inch. It adds weight but saves the pain of risking a board and foil combo not working. When switching between winging and paddling using one board its
great having room to move in the track.
Are these army DW boards aimed for entry level paddlers? The small sizes look pretty extreme for most average punters getting into the sport. Maybe the 7 footers are more generously sized. I will await more info and Keen to know board weights.
The positioning of the boxes is a subject worthy of a whole seperate thread. I am very intrigued at the positioning of the downwinders back foot. In watching one of James Casey's latest videos there are riders on new uni, axis, lift and new gofoil mast yet all the riders had their back foot on the mast with very little variation between the group. Maybe 40 mm variation at most. The boards due to their foam distribution only have one ideal place to balance over so why the demand for such long boxes. You can look also at Oskar's video of their latest big downwinder and again all standing with their back foot on the mast.
In prone you can move the mast forward to optimise pump as long you are good enough to slide and launch forward on the jump up. But still the best guys have their foot on the mast when on the optimum foils for the waves. With so little variation in back foot riding position it's hard to understand the big box requirement. I certainly don't want the weight penalty.
Maybe lift and Armstrong require the balance well back of the actual riding position when trying to get them to lift on the paddle up but once flying the balance moves forward?
maybe because the sport is so young board manufactures put the boxes in the wrong spot?
maybe us learners have no clue where the foil should go and are relying on the prone experience and getting it wrong?