Select to expand quote
BurleighFoil said..
yes, the wings are incredibly efficient for their size. The boys at Cloud have really nailed the hybrid concept of low aspect / high aspect fusion. I havent tried the F28 as yet, i have been on the F38 ever since they landed. I want to foil it in every condition i can and then hop back on the F32 for a week or so and then the F28. Talking to the boys at Cloud, they rave about the F28, so fast and turns so hard, cant wait.
Totally agree with you that they've nailed it on these wings.
I had one session on the F38, also kiting. Sold my wings (swings), so kiting only at the moment, but my curiosity to try out the F38 anyhow got the better of me. This wing is a very different beast from the F32. It generates a lot of lift, pops straight onto the foil. It doesn't have the same propensity to stall when pumped at low speed. And like the F32, it's completely silent. It does however turn noticeably less freely than the 32. For winging, I think the F38 is going to be the goto in the cloud ix lineup. It's too much for kiting.
One of the main reasons why I went with cloud IX in the first place was they were one of the few foiler companies (especially at the time) who seemed to crossover from kite foiling to surf foiling and work for both of these. That was before winging came along. I was keen to get into sup/prone, and still kind of am.For me the F32 is such a magic foil for kitefoiiing. So efficient and such glide, effortless to pump when needed, really nicely balanced, but playful and easy turning as well. As I don't live right by the open ocean I make do with riding the bay wind swell, which get's pretty decent from about 20 knots, mainly kiting, but lately winging as well. I'm really curious to hear reports on the difference between the F32 and the F28.
Right now I don't fell like I need the F28 or F24, but I'm amazed what I'm seeing the prone foilers doing on a wing with < 1000cm2, so maybe I'll change my mind if I try it too! Look forward to hearing the reports :)