Select to expand quote
UncleBob said..cammd said..
Beautiful boats for sure, but given all the talk of safety safety safety offshore with zero keels and alpha rudders etc why would they spec an in mast furler for the main. That seems like a big concession on safety for the sake of push button convenience.
I'm curious, how is a furling main a safety issue??
Kraken go on about safety being number priority, in mast furling is not safest choice, I'm sure it is safe, unless it jams when trying to reef before a rising gale or squall
Its a more complex system then slab reefing and stuff goes wrong on boats, mostly at the worst times so simple and reliable is safer. Reliability deceases with age too. Seems like a difficult system to maintain, how do you check all components are in good working order inside the entire length of the mast.
If it jams how to you get it down, at least with in boom furling you can still drop the main if a jam occurs but with in mast furling you probably have to go aloft to sort a jam, not what you want to do when you need to be reefing, particularly on a boat that is shorthanded like a lot of cruisers are.
I have never used in mast furling but I believe you have to have the apparent wind forward of the mast to reef otherwise the risk of a jam is greatly increased. Read this account of in boom furling, it highlights the risk of having to turn to windward to reef
www.bwsailing.com/anatomy-of-a-tragedy-at-sea/Also you will always have more weight aloft even when reefed.
Krakens sells itself as no compromise on safety but I think in mast furling is a compromise on safety for the sake of convenience on a "real" bluewater boat.