Select to expand quote
BlueMoon said..
Considering the previous replies of genuine interest in the "unconventional" rig, i'm not sure where your "Rant" came from Chris.
Yes Yara, maybe the three supports could be the problem, I would have thought 2 beefier supports would be better. Ditching the rotating aspect of it would no doubt simplify things too.
It came about because some advocates of free-standing rig pretend that free-standing rigs are far more reliable and trouble-free than conventional rigs. This cat is an example of the fact that the claim may be untrue, which is why it would be interesting to find out more about it.
The rest of the rant came about because the claims that freestanding masts are more reliable may be just one more example of the tendency for some fans of alternative rigs to criticise mainstream rigs repeatedly. Have a look (for example) at the stuff the Junk Rig Association members post on Boat Design Forum, or on their own forum. It contains lots of criticism of the "conventional" rigs, including many claims that are simply untrue. The latest topic to be posted on the Sailboats section of Boat Design Forum also contains an unfavourable reference to "conventional" rigs, this time from a cat ketch fan, but also untrue. It just gets a bit tiresome to see so many derogatory remarks about rigs.
None of the above is a criticism of unconventional rigs - I own and love a bunch of them myself. It's just that many owners of unconventional rigs make a lot of incorrect critical remarks about conventional ones, instead of just allowing everyone to enjoy their sailing without criticism.