Select to expand quote
nods said..
I agree and disagree.. ....... I like the cats they use in the Americas Cup, they are amazing feats of engineering and would be amazing to sail.
But I don't think they should be in the Americas Cup....the Cup had been sailed in what the best mono hulls of their period for a 100+ years and it should have stayed a match race with mono hulls.
Yep, a lot of the support for the change to multis in the AC has come from people who seem to have obtained their America's Cup history from rubbishy press releases and over-hyped news reports. They say things such as "the America's Cup has always been about the biggest, fastest and most extreme boats" which is simply untrue. The AC boats have rarely been the fastest class racing, and they have never been the biggest racing boats. Even John C Stevens, the main man of the syndicate that owned the original America, had a boat that was too big and fast to be allowed to enter the America's Cup itself.
Unfortunately the pop history has been used as a way to distort the truth about the AC. In reality it has normally been quite closely linked to the mainstream racing. It has normally used basically the same rules (ie the vast cutters like Reliance used the same rating rule as the 25 foot Half Raters, the 12 Metres were big versions of 8,6, Scandanavian 5 and even 2.4 Metres) and the boats have almost always been MORE conservative than smaller craft, rather than being the radical machines that the hypesters claim.
So the move to cats has divorced the AC from its true heritage and its true strengths. The pity of it is that those making the decisions didn't actually have the guts to do research on the history and on whether the modern format would really work. The big drop in the fleet size shows that their calls were wrong, yet they won't admit it.
Even more unfortunately, the same concept, which claims that extreme performance will create more interest, is running deep through the sport at the moment and the whole sport is suffering because of it.