A lot of issues here to sort. Imho the halyards can be significantly reduced for local Aust east coast sailing. If the intention is to still keep the rig as world cruising capable then maybe leave as is would be the cost effective solution. But Spindrift has done that already and it maybe isn't the plan going fwd? All those halyards terminating at the mast in their end loops are not efficient.............and that layout would have been designed for far more crew than the 2 person crew who went to Alaska and back. Look at Southern Cross Cup and Admirals Cup yachts of around the year 1974 and there were more winches than 2 sticks could be poked at, with crews of 8+ in that size of yacht, on the foredeck, at the mast, in the pit, in the fwd cockpit, in the mid cockpit then in the aft cockpit steering who was normally the source of all problems.........
1 For the boom topping lift suggest remove it and replace with a Selden rod kicker type boom vang which provides compression capability to hold the boom up as well as operating as a normal vang - see here - we have an earlier model and it is a gem. Not cheap - there are surely other types in the market.
support.seldenmast.com/en/products/rigid_vangs_-_rodkickers/rodkicker_rigid_vang.html2 With masthead rig and hanked on genoas/jibs you only need one genoa/jib halyard. I see via prior posts that you have a furling genoa system via Bryce at infinity Rigging - one of the real good guys and does a top job along with Peter. So maybe still you only need one genoa/jib halyard for this furling system.
3 Only need 1 kite halyard for a masthead rig.
4 Then just the kite pole topping lift.
Kite pole downhaul is not associated with the mast - just lead it along the foredeck 1/2 way back from forestay to mast and up to the kite pole downhaul bridle. Better still lead it from the mast base straight to the pole bridle then it won't need to be adjusted as much when the kite brace is adjusted.
So 3 halyards and 1 kite pole topping lift internally in the mast, 4 in total.
These should all be able to be lead aft to 2 winches each side of the companionway on the cabin top - assuming the cabin top compression strength from the mast to the winches is able to take these loads. Would expect so but would check the cabin top structure for longitudinal members as well as the (assumed as per Ramona) ply skins of the cabin top and deck.