Select to expand quote
arloj said..
Design is super slick by xenon however, il be swapping the monk bindings over tomorrow to hopefully change my mind but i think its safe to say if your in flat water the laluz could be a nice freeride board. if your in chop get a monk.
Some truth here, wish it was so simple. What if you ride both regularly, almost half and half?
As per wise cauncys words, always demo TTs using the exact same pads and straps so good idea. Agreed I don't rate the Laluz pads and straps, naf, the shinn ones slightly less naf, but both naf. It buggers me why companies that do boards only don't make the utmost awesome pads and straps, the very best. They should leave all the other companies behind on this as boards are their specialty.
Agreed the monk is built for UK chop conditions, with its rocker, outline and and flex. The Laluz is a much stiffer board, especially the new one. The tips do all the work, the centre is fairly rigid. Between you and me the 135 is the sweet size....gives you more tip flex and movement , especially over the chop, 132 was way too rigid for me.
Load and pop, flat water there is no competition here, they aren't even close. Ocean....well after riding the monk for a year and a half, now the Laluz about the same time, once you dial into the specifics, the land and pop is far superior on the Laluz, even in the ocean. More so on the new one, infact I can hold so much speed on hey his board now I only use 35mm fins, no need for the 50mm. Carving....yeh the monk is good at that, the new laluz is even more squared off. But I've had the Laluz out in your conditions and it works just fine...how aggressive can you get with wave carving on a TT anyway, there is always a limit.
But yeh if all you are doing is hitting oceanic conditions, the monk is still a bloody good option,
Get in flat water, their is no comparison.
So it's finding something that suites your overall riding I suppose.
One thing is for sure, both companies have to lift their game re straps and pads, especially xenon.