WAKSA. said...
As required by the WAKSA Constitution, we are formally notifying members of two motions for consideration by members regarding the Australian Kite Surfing Association (AKSA):
1) It is proposed that: WAKSA members vote to accept (or reject) the proposed national new body structure, as outlined in the items: 110510-Restructuring Plan-AKSA-CPK and 110208-KBA Constitution – DRAFT and be bound by this national bodies proposed new constitution.
2) It is proposed that: WAKSA members vote to endorse (or not endorse) the change in name from 'Australian Kite Surfing Association (AKSA)' to 'Kite Boarding Australia Limited (KBA).'
Details of the proposed changes to the AKSA structure can be reviewed at www.waksa.org.au - under the 'Documents' tab - titled 'AKSA Restructure'.
WAKSA members such as myself, now is the time to have active discussions on this - raise your concerns with the WAKSA executive!
WAKSA exec, could we please have some clarification?
1. If we vote no, do we run the risk of becoming a seperate entity to the national body / other state bodies?
2. What happens if several member bodies vote no? How will it go ahead?
3. I notice that the Restructuring Plan is 'Draft for discussion purposes only' - why is that? How was it drawn up? Who is Campbell King and what are his interests?
4. Apart from the stated advantages of the change and the concerns above (1 and 2), what are the other pitfalls / disadvantages for myself as a member, and the interests of WAKSA as a state organisation?
5. Is the WAKSA exec recommending that we vote yes for the change and why? Please could you expand on your view.
Thanks!