Select to expand quote
Andrash said..
For comparing the power of two kites, there is more to it, then their size. For one, it is the flying characteristics of the kite. Dedicated wave kites (those I've flown) have less grunt power and generate less power at turn than all-rounders. Obviously you do not want a reactive kite on the waves. The more skillful / experienced the kiter the more these characteristics matter.
In my experience, what makes the Neo feel bigger or more powerful is that it generates more power when it moves and has a bit more grunt power in comparison with other wave kites. I have not noticed an unusual power at turn. This extra power may not be welcome for someone just starting on the waves, but it is very useful in the hand of a more experienced rider. This might be a reason for the Neo's good reputation among pro's (so I've read).
It would be interesting to see the exact specifications (e.g. surface area, projected area etc) for different brands and models.
Exactly mate. the number on the side of kites is a mystery how it is derived. Is it laid flat area? it is projected area? they wont tell us. So anyone comparing Xm2 kite size between different brands will most likely find discrepancies.
I think with the Neo one of the main reasons for the power is the larger diameter of the leading edge. This leads to a deeper aero foil and more grunt. The LE diameter of other wave kites that have less grunt is significantly less from what I have seen of the reo, section and roam.
With the grunt you either like it or you don't. Whatever floats your boat. I like it; powering upwind back to the peak, power to punch through the break when its big with lots of water moving around, ability to ride 2m2 less than aforementioned other wave kites and when you want to send it off a kicker if your powered it can send you into a low earth orbit then bring you down with a nice cushy landing that wont break your favourite board.