Select to expand quote
KiteDesigner said..
The 400m rule was put in place some 5 years ago, but appears to be not valid now.
If only there was some organization that could represent the NSW kiters and keep us informed.
It would be great to hear from them and what they have to say about this on SB.
It looks like a lack of action from NSWKBA committee ( mostly shop owners or shop team riders ),
At least the NSWKBA guys had time to stock up on life jackets and posted about that on facebook.
Robbo2099 posted the below:
"5 years ago NSW Maritime proposed a compromise: that life jackets only be required on open waters (ocean) when kiting alone and more than 400m off shore. Rather than becoming embroiled in a protracted fight with NSW Maritime, we decided to accept this and move on, which was what was enacted in the legislation.
It now appears that this has been disregarded for whatever reason in the new legislation. Would appear that NSWKBA might want to make an urgent approach to see if they can renegotiate these original terms back into the legislation, as from what I am aware, there has been no change to the evidence. "
So will mambo look like the image above? lots of pretty life vests?
Maybe you should ask the committee what happened before pointing the finger and making un educated posts on Seabreaze.
So what if it is team riders or shop owners on the committee? We give our time freely for the good of trying to help the sport in NSW.
NSWKBA do not sell equipment and have not stocked up on life jackets. RMS were at the AGM and showed attendee's an option of what would be suitable to wear.
Can you blame shops for stocking a product that is now law? Maybe you should yell at all the bike shops for selling helmets as well.....how dare they!
So you know what exactly happened. This ruling was posted on a website not easily found and despite NSWKBA having dealing about this previously we were not aware about it until a few days before deadline. Emails about all previous correspondence were sent with no response.
The ruling looks like it was wanted to go through unchallenged, this is why we were not alerted to it.
KA have been doing what they can about this. At the end of the day we are a minority and just because we don't like it or stamp our feet wont mean we can get a law changed. It looks to be the same minister that did the bike laws behind this one.