Okay, won't change stance, still awesome response from Jimmy and the IKA & ISAF jury.
It would appear that none of the racer's were aware of the measurement infringement to builders spec, as they were confidential (between builder and IKA). However, should anyone wish to use the "protested" equipment post this decision, in an ISAF event they would be blown out if they knew of the fault
This suggests that now it becomes the responsibility of the possible "new" owner of the used boards (with IKA plate) to be aware they are "non-compliant" therefore risk a serious Section 69 breach and further DSQ from ISAF competition
Please don't misinterpret my comments above; the point is you pay $3K for a New IKA plated race board, with an "IKA plate of compliance". Therefore prospective secondhand sellers of "defective" equipment should be advised to have the official compliance plate of the IKA removed either at the "Sellers, IKA's and/or manufacturers" expense, prior to disposal.
Again, I will stress, I believe both the manufacturer (Jimmy & Co.) and IKA have demonstrated professionalism in their conduct and actions to continue the fair and controlled development of the sport.
The above is stated as a point of opinion only, I disclaim any affiliation with the manufacturer or the IKA, either regarding or associated to the regarding of the ruling.