No idea for sure but from what I've noticed though is that wider and flatter makes rolling more work.
The LF FF and the Double Agent rolled ok. Call it the base line...
The Hoverglide really didn't want to without lots of body English.
Oddly enough the Alpine Access which had a similarly wide, high AR wing rolled maybe a little more freely than the LF and DA.
Spitfire was way too twitchy for me but I didn't have long enough on it, apparently.
Axis kite foil wing is flat but rolled freely too. The prototype 720cm wide surf wing with clipped tips rolled faster than the 720 but wasn't as nice to ride for me, although others loved it. The 920 was too stable for kiting IMO.
I think there are many paths to foiling nirvana, you just gotta chose the one that suits. Which is why we have 10,000 kite brands probably :D
For me, low span, low AR, high chord wings seem to have more issues with speed than do higher AR wings with a "nice" anhedral... Your guess is as good as mine!
Select to expand quote
Plummet said..
More or vertical stabilizer, longer fuse, more stabalizer size comparable to front wing, increased wing size, inc stabilizer aoa.
All these things increase stability with the disadvantage of decreased manuveuribility.
Easiest way to improve stability with your current set up is to shim the rear stab to increase aoa.
He's talking specifically about roll stability.