Select to expand quote
Harrow said..LastSupper said..
Victoran police booked 2 people for posting on FB about there holidays last year ! So who ever thinks there not interested in the local joe blo needs to go and have a good hard look at themselves! This is not looking good for our freedom !
That totally stinks. Shouldn't some sort of evidence be needed to give a ticket? Posting a photo on FB that could have been taken at any time (in these cases actually taken last year) shouldn't constitute enough evidence to issue a ticket. Perhaps it could initiate a 'please explain', and the person be given the opportunity to do so, but to simply issue the ticket based on effectively nothing shouldn't be allowed. Dare I say this mentality reinforces the doubts on the Pell case.
This sounds like a steaming pile of BS, for a start were travel restrictions in place last year???
And it's surprising hoe many people are ignorant on how fines/infringements work. The default setting of the entire judicial process is to send people to court, they can either plead guilty and cop the fine/penalty, or plead not guilty and everyone goes to trial.
Now what infringements/tickets/fines do, is give you a CHOICE and a short cut to pleading guilty, you do that by paying the fine at the post office or whatever. The cop giving the fine doesn't choose your innocence or guilt. You do by paying it or taking it to court as a not guilty.
The advantages of the infringement system... the punter stays out of court, doesn't get a criminal/court record, it doesn't choke up the courts even more and the ticket penalty is always way less than what court can hand out.
Got a ticket? You ALWAYS have the option of having your day in court, and you know what, you don't even need to prove you're innocent. It's up to the cops to prove to the magistrate you're guilty.