The question is if more expensive means always better?
More expensive = better?
The answer may come from rocket science.
SpaceX is building rockets at 70 mln a piece, and SLS still trying to build one at 1 bln and can't finish with constant delay and cost overruns.
SpaceX rocket then will be reused 10x , 100x even in the future , since SLS is single use, disposable. Now we could reverse question and ask if you rather prefer to fly on cheaper rocket into space, that already made hundreds successful launches and landing or rather stick with more expensive one off knock off, never tested in real life with ground staff learning the process with you,
everydayastronaut.com/sls-vs-starship/
what is even more suprising - SpaceX is now more concern about effectivness of their rocket production system, then pure estethics .Their most recent monster rocket is made of stainless steel, not even painted. Some say even, looks a bit ugly, but who cares if can fly higher, faster and cheaper then everything else. Their function is fulfilled perfectly, safety ensured but estethics valour comes only as second.

similar tend could made path to automobile industry.
Tesla Cybertrack is made of unpainted stainless steel too, considered by some ugly, but quee of excited buyers already waiting for product.