bjw said..
"A short sharp lockdown", do you mean like Victoria had?
WA is a small population. It's much easier to manage. But if restricting freedom of travel, people being able to use a house they own, attending a funeral, seeing loved ones and killing tourism businesses sounds fine to you. Then I'm thinking WA needs better a education system.
The virus is waiting for you to open. It's unlikely it'll disappear, you can delay it's arrival, by restricting your own freedoms, but it will arrive.
Hmm, spend a week in lock down whilst the contact tracers get on top of it, then open up completely again, no virus. Or let everyone wonder around and spread it, with some half assed restrictions in place, and get to the not so happy place nsw is in now. Locked up long term, virus everywhere.
it was last xmas it became apparent things were going to go south for nsw. She was letting people into an outbreak area for xmas visits. Im not sure where Gladys was educated, but If she cant see why thats a bad thing, and she, the states premier is the shining example of it, perhaps its the nsw education system that needs serious review.
yeah, for sure we have a smaller population, but thats got nothing to do with why we are virus free. the much larger part of WAs population still live in densely populated areas. we're not all on farms. We're virus free because marky mark shuts us down as soon as theres been an infection wondering about. And manages our borders with the other states depending on how their situation is going.
I love the "its coming for ya" attitude, and you are right. The virus will be everywhere eventually. But in the meantime i'd rather lose freedom for a week here and there and open up to the rest of the world when everyone is vaccinated, than sit at home indefinitely, not able to visit anyone, or get out on the water because the virus is running rampant outside.