Select to expand quote
slammin said..
I'm a long term chef. The money sux dogs balls for the effort and skills required. I did the 4yr apprenticeship. The 1st year was less than the dole. It was around the time they 1st mooted about the idea of work for the dole. That didn't happen because everybody agreed that it would be unfair.....
I've stuck with it because I've always held out for day shifts and I actually enjoy cooking.
At least you have found a career where you mostly enjoy what you are doing. Its a good thing. I remember my first job too, and it paid less than the dole, but I think a lot of jobs are like that in the first couple of years and probably weeds out the people that won't want to finish.
Split shifts sound like a crazy idea. A way of not paying you when you aren't needed and shifting the effective cost of this back to you. A smart employer would find a way to use that resource during the off-time, but if everyone allows this, then they can just do it. I am sure if
I asked this question about hospitality because it seems obvious to me. If you pay good wages and provide good conditions, people will work for you. If you don't, people will do the work if they have to, but you can't expect any great loyalty or any great pool of talent that you can draw down upon. This applies to all jobs.
Yet, people out there seem to believe this rubbish. 'Local people are too lazy' and 'we pay too much for the dole' are just lazy stupid people thinking that this is the reason why and why they seem happy to push down wages. When someone else is happy to push down your wages but not willing to do the same job, its out of touch.
457 Visas are a sore point with me. They had their place, but there really weren't a good answer to why there were no trained people in various industries. For a short term they might be okay, but without training in parallel and apprenticeship programs to bring new people to the trade, its just a way of getting cheap employees for a short time. It does nothing to solve the long term problem.
One of my work colleagues owns a Greek restaurant. He hired Greek chefs from Greece because 'they are authentic and the food tastes different'. I suspect that there was a bit of 'the local chefs won't work for the rate I want to pay, and they won't listen to me as well as the ones that are under the cloud of a visa' as well.
I wonder how many people have gotten 457 visas over the last few years and are now wincing at the cost of living in Australia. Those Greek chefs aren't going to be deliriously happy about the cost of housing in Sydney compared to Greece. Similarly a lot of Indian and Chinese workers are probably staring at the price of housing and wondering why it is so high.
I think this is also responsible for a lot of jobs now requiring previous experience, whereas before they would take graduate trainees, or trainees, or apprentices. If you can try and fill the role with someone that has already been trained and avoid the costs of training someone up, then you take the lazy way out.
When I started work, there were traineeships and graduate trainee programs, and this was during a down-turn in the economy. Now, I feel so sorry for these Uni students that come out and find that there are no jobs because someone somewhere found it easier to employ cheap labour from overseas.