This is pretty amazing. What a mind to do something like that.

Brilliant!
Cheers for posting

Thumbs down, you've been fooled.

He says he is not choosing any of the notes...that they are chosen by nature and science.

What he fails to say is that he is deliberately choosing different instrument voices for those notes selectively to create 'good' and 'bad' sounding effects for elements and compounds to control people's perception.

Flourine maps to F#, which forms a major triad with Hydrogen and Carbon (D-F#-A). That would normally be a pleasant, satisfying sound to the human ear, yet he makes it sound horrible by choosing a sound with a distorted triangular wave for flourine.

He wants lead to sound bad, so he says it has a warbling sound because it can exist as isotopes of different mass...uh, but what about the isotopes of all the elements that he makes sound nice? Plus he chooses a distorted synthesised bass instrument sound for it. Why not the nice comforting pure tone of a tubular bell?

You could make any compound sound good or bad using his method.

Could write 10 pages of all the misinformation that is in this!!

Contrived and redundant. Discordant and harmonious sounds can be made with talent and skill.

A silly program is not required and is something a lazy composer or modern installation artist would do just to be "different".

"Feel and experience chemistry without studying it". That's a load on nonsense.

he's mixed too much hemp with his O2.

Select to expand quote

Harrow said..
Thumbs down, you've been fooled.

He says he is not choosing any of the notes...that they are chosen by nature and science.

What he fails to say is that he is deliberately choosing different instrument voices for those notes selectively to create 'good' and 'bad' sounding effects for elements and compounds to control people's perception.

Flourine maps to F#, which forms a major triad with Hydrogen and Carbon (D-F#-A). That would normally be a pleasant, satisfying sound to the human ear, yet he makes it sound horrible by choosing a sound with a distorted triangular wave for flourine.

He wants lead to sound bad, so he says it has a warbling sound because it can exist as isotopes of different mass...uh, but what about the isotopes of all the elements that he makes sound nice? Plus he chooses a distorted synthesised bass instrument sound for it. Why not the nice comforting pure tone of a tubular bell?

You could make any compound sound good or bad using his method.

Could write 10 pages of all the misinformation that is in this!!

Mike the health ranger from NonsenseNews in the thumbnail to the video . . . he's a scientist like I'm a pro kiter.

Select to expand quote

Harrow said...
Thumbs down, you've been fooled.

He says he is not choosing any of the notes...that they are chosen by nature and science.

What he fails to say is that he is deliberately choosing different instrument voices for those notes selectively to create 'good' and 'bad' sounding effects for elements and compounds to control people's perception.

Flourine maps to F#, which forms a major triad with Hydrogen and Carbon (D-F#-A). That would normally be a pleasant, satisfying sound to the human ear, yet he makes it sound horrible by choosing a sound with a distorted triangular wave for flourine.

He wants lead to sound bad, so he says it has a warbling sound because it can exist as isotopes of different mass...uh, but what about the isotopes of all the elements that he makes sound nice? Plus he chooses a distorted synthesised bass instrument sound for it. Why not the nice comforting pure tone of a tubular bell?

You could make any compound sound good or bad using his method.

Could write 10 pages of all the misinformation that is in this!!

Cheers harrow - hook line and sinkered me at first pass haha
Watched the first 5 mins and thought "brilliant, I'll come back to this"

Now I'll flag it. Everyone has an agenda these days!!

Select to expand quote

mazdon said..

Harrow said...
Thumbs down, you've been fooled.

He says he is not choosing any of the notes...that they are chosen by nature and science.

What he fails to say is that he is deliberately choosing different instrument voices for those notes selectively to create 'good' and 'bad' sounding effects for elements and compounds to control people's perception.

Flourine maps to F#, which forms a major triad with Hydrogen and Carbon (D-F#-A). That would normally be a pleasant, satisfying sound to the human ear, yet he makes it sound horrible by choosing a sound with a distorted triangular wave for flourine.

He wants lead to sound bad, so he says it has a warbling sound because it can exist as isotopes of different mass...uh, but what about the isotopes of all the elements that he makes sound nice? Plus he chooses a distorted synthesised bass instrument sound for it. Why not the nice comforting pure tone of a tubular bell?

You could make any compound sound good or bad using his method.

Could write 10 pages of all the misinformation that is in this!!

Cheers harrow - hook line and sinkered me at first pass haha
Watched the first 5 mins and thought "brilliant, I'll come back to this"

Now I'll flag it. Everyone has an agenda these days!!

Also, Mike is against fluoridation in the water.

Select to expand quote

Kamikuza said; "Also, Mike the health ranger from NonsenseNews in the thumbnail to the video" and "Mike is against fluoridation in the water"

I have it on good authority that "mike" is really "petermac33"

Select to expand quote

Rupert said...

Kamikuza said; "Also, Mike the health ranger from NonsenseNews in the thumbnail to the video" and "Mike is against fluoridation in the water"

I have it on good authority that "mike" is really "petermac33"

Plenty of sucker to fund all the quacks

Well, I guess everyone who's posted doesn't think very highly of Mike Adams.
For anyone who isn't all that interested in science and fell asleep when his teacher explained the elemental table, this completely harmless video might interest you. Yes, he's made it sound nice, because he also has an interest in music, which would explain why he's put time into doing this. If you think it's a bad thing that he points out things like lead and glyphosate don't resonate well with otherwise life-giving elements by making them sound bad, well.. whatever, you live in your world, how you perceive it is up to you.

Select to expand quote

ThinkaBowtit said..
Well, I guess everyone who's posted doesn't think very highly of Mike Adams.
For anyone who isn't all that interested in science and fell asleep when his teacher explained the elemental table, this completely harmless video might interest you. Yes, he's made it sound nice, because he also has an interest in music, which would explain why he's put time into doing this. If you think it's a bad thing that he points out things like lead and glyphosate don't resonate well with otherwise life-giving elements by making them sound bad, well.. whatever, you live in your world, how you perceive it is up to you.

Y'know, I was going to let that slide . . . but I love propaganda so:

It's not harmless. He's pushing his anti-science agenda to hoodwink the muppets who'll flock to his page and buy his ****. Get enough muppets in one place and you have a chorus loud enough to drown out actual science. Problem.

He put time into doing this because it'll make him money.

He points out lead and glyphosate because that's his agenda. See the first point.

It's not perception. He has to do **** like this to counter the actual science that says what he's pushing is nonsense.

Please, just no. If you want to hear what nature sounds like, google the block hole collision gravity wave.

Block hole collision, got it

Select to expand quote

ThinkaBowtit said...
Block hole collision, got it

I swear to god, I'm going to find the guy who programs the spell corrector and force him to watch this video on an endless loop