myscreenname said..

cammd said..

You sound lonely

You ARE deluded

I am crystal clear on this issue. Abortion kills unborn babies. Prove me wrong.

Behold a Person...Amen.

myscreenname said..
Face the facts, you and PM33 are freaks who live under rocks, you are in a miniscule minority. Doesn't mean you are wrong, but just means you are close to irrelevant. Most believe abortion is OK, with some guidelines. Not a perfect rule, but way better than what some pro life freaks, like you, are banging on about.

Still name calling hey, no worries I can live with being labelled a "pro life freak".

How about you Pete, is all this name calling making you question your views on the killing babies.

cammd said..
Is all this name calling making you question your views on the killing babies.

I have a huge problem with the IDF murdering thousands of Gazan babies and children. Where do you stand on that issue?

As for embryo's... they mean about as much to me as eating an egg daily for breakfast. I don't give it any thought.

Does that offend you?

Pete and I are right, everyone else is wrong, especially Remery.... about everything, have a good night

cammd said..
Pete and I are right, everyone else is wrong, especially Remery.... about everything, have a good night

Amen.

Placing greater value on a birds egg over an unborn baby is disgusting

I wonder at which point you reach hypocrisy, I'm guessing it's somewhere around the point of the earth belonging to humans. For me it's eating farmed meat. I know that animals should live free in the wild until I hunt and kill them for food, but I compromise my morals by eating free range meat.
Some don't believe in killing, so no abortion, no euthanasia, no death penalty. And they don't believe in animal farming, so they're vegan. Wouldn't go to a zoo because animals belong in the wild. But not their dog, they own that dog, can't even see the hypocrisy.

remery said..

psychojoe said.

There's no need to murder the homeless and junkies, just give them a vasectomy and the cycle breaks itself in just one generation.
Sweden was doing it to certain patients, and got branded as having done something wrong. No, it's the right thing to do.

Adolph Hitler likes this post.

The truth is always unpopular.
And thank you.

cammd said..

myscreenname said..
Face the facts, you and PM33 are freaks who live under rocks, you are in a miniscule minority. Doesn't mean you are wrong, but just means you are close to irrelevant. Most believe abortion is OK, with some guidelines. Not a perfect rule, but way better than what some pro life freaks, like you, are banging on about.

Still name calling hey, no worries I can live with being labelled a "pro life freak".

How about you Pete, is all this name calling making you question your views on the killing babies.

There are two paths you head down in life.

One is the path of love, the other path heads in the opposite direction and the toxic crew head there. They live in fear and are their daily habits are motivated by their out of control ego. They give off a toxic vibe.

Name calling / hate comes from the ego. Water off a ducks back mostly to me and no it does not make me change my views in any way.

Once you are headed in the wrong direction you rarely stay stationary so the hate becomes even greater.

Toxic emotions have a massive impact on your physical health.

They are only harming themselves.

cammd said..

D3 said..

cammd said
Its pretty clear what happens to a community when men no longer take responsibility for their children, only a fool would recommend that outcome.

I'm pretty sure I'm not quite understanding what you're saying here?
Are you saying that if abortion is banned, men will all of a sudden take responsibility for every pregnancy they cause?

The above argument that men have no say in abortion because they don't carry the baby during pregnancy absolves them of responsibility for deciding to keep the child or terminate it.

If you have no say over a matter then you cannot be responsible for it, that's just logic. So if you want to push that argument don't be surprised about unintended outcomes.

Its a flawed principle anyway, its akin to man telling his stay at home partner she has no say over financial decisions because he earns all the money. Its a BS argument that completely ignores the Father's rights and more importantly the child's right to live. Its just a ploy to shut down any opposition and the same principle doesn't stand up to any sort of scrutiny in any other situation.

Because the fetus is residing inside another human being, I would argue that blokes don't get the final say on a womans choice.

They most certainly ARE responsible for any child born as a result of THEIR decision to engage in intercourse.

But your comparison of a womans choice to a bloke exerting coercive control over a stay at home partner just doesn't work.

A bloke denying a woman autonomy over her own body and forcing her to carry his baby to term is also coercive control.

Physically healthy 28-year-old woman will be euthanised next month (msn.com)

Pcdefender said..
Name calling / hate comes from the ego. Water off a ducks back mostly to me and no it does not make me change my views in any way.

You appear to wake up very triggered everyday, why?

Did you experiment, maybe a bit too much, with recreational drugs growing up?

What is this need you have to spew out extremist alt-right and other whacko beliefs on a water sport forum daily?

Do you wake up in hope thinking you may change someones views today? What is driving you to bang on about this freaky rubbish every single day?

It's so time consuming and very sad.

Pcdefender said..

cammd said..

myscreenname said..
Face the facts, you and PM33 are freaks who live under rocks, you are in a miniscule minority. Doesn't mean you are wrong, but just means you are close to irrelevant. Most believe abortion is OK, with some guidelines. Not a perfect rule, but way better than what some pro life freaks, like you, are banging on about.

Still name calling hey, no worries I can live with being labelled a "pro life freak".

How about you Pete, is all this name calling making you question your views on the killing babies.

There are two paths you head down in life.

One is the path of love, the other path heads in the opposite direction and the toxic crew head there. They live in fear and are their daily habits are motivated by their out of control ego. They give off a toxic vibe.

Name calling / hate comes from the ego. Water off a ducks back mostly to me and no it does not make me change my views in any way.

Once you are headed in the wrong direction you rarely stay stationary so the hate becomes even greater.

Toxic emotions have a massive impact on your physical health.

They are only harming themselves.

Sounds like karma

"good scientific based defense "

Hmmm.... I'm not going to argue if Abortion is good or bad.

I'm just going to state a couple of facts.

Criminalizing abortion does not stop women having abortions, it just forces them to use unsafe methods of terminating pregnancy.

Criminalizing abortion means more women will die each year. More women will not be able to get pregnant again.

Estimated 13% of all maternal deaths are from women having to use unsafe, illegal abortion.

D3 said..
"good scientific based defense "

Hmmm.... I'm not going to argue if Abortion is good or bad.

I'm just going to state a couple of facts.

Criminalizing abortion does not stop women having abortions, it just forces them to use unsafe methods of terminating pregnancy.

Criminalizing abortion means more women will die each year. More women will not be able to get pregnant again.

Estimated 13% of all maternal deaths are from women having to use unsafe, illegal abortion.

semantics, change the word good for robust then. The point was you cannot prove with a ROBUST scientific argument that a human life is not taken during abortion.

Let me quote a % back at you 100% of aborted babies die. Claiming abortion is healthcare is propaganda, a human life ends with every successful abortion and the vast majority are perfectly healthy Mother and Child before the procedure. They are just plain facts.

And that leads to the next point

psychojoe said..
Good point D3.
Women are clearly seen as womb bearing vessels without feelings once the miracle of a cholesterol coated protein survives spermicide long enough to pierce ovary. But what if it doesn't pierce the ovary, are the pro-lifers hell bent on forcing ectopic pregnancies to miscarriage? Did they think that sperm has a fighting chance.

Women are clearly seen as womb bearing vessel. What a load of HorseS&%T , they are seen a Mothers with a child, what is clear is that the child is not ever taken into consideration by pro choice.

Ectopic pregnancies are not abortions, they are not a choice. This point is just a ploy to distract from the thousands upon thousands of terminations of perfectly healthy pregnancies.