So...right...

I am thinking there might be about $368bn of opportunity coming up that could do for Carantoc what bitcoin investment did for myscreenname.

I realise a large chunk of that $368bn might already be set aside for consulting services from Macroscienc, but I'm sure there is a little left over if I can provide some positive input.

Problem is I know nothing not much about subs. So I was wondering if anyone here could peer review my ideas before I submit them formally.

Idea 1) make 'em water tight
Idea 2) don't design the missiles based on a boomerang

Your a boomer rang

Make sure they don't sink, no wait, submarine, change that to make sure they sink.

No flywire doors

Idea 3) corpse & coke eject capsule

I love subs, got 3 X 300w 12" in my loungeroom alone. My car has an awesome 150w 10" that will move ya bowel if your not paying attention. Will also admit to being partially deaf after a few decades of thunderous bass.

Apparently, Chicken Teriyaki is the best seller.

if they are a yank design, make sure you get the metric/imperial conversions correct.

I love subs too ... foot long, Italian Herb and Cheese, Steak Melt. Don't immerse in water.

Make em stealth. Paint them blue/green like colour. Maybe even employ someone like Ken Done to professionally capture the true color of the South China Sea. Maybe paint the top of the periscope blue, to match the sky.

That way, when we are protecting Taiwan with all three subs the Chink Navy won't see them.

Is Paul Keating right about the subs?

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..
Is Paul Keating right about the subs?

Paul's right about everything, just ask him.

$358,000,000,000. Paul is actually a very clever man. One ICBM would see his statement justified.

Remember all the way with LBJ? Now we're all ridin' with Joe Biden. (Exactly where, who knows?)

Select to expand quote

musorianin said..
Remember all the way with LBJ? Now we're all ridin' with Joe Biden. (Exactly where, who knows?)

Somehow doubt he himself has much of a clue either.

Funny thing war. Pretty much a constant in my 68 years yet I've not only never met anyone who wants one but never met anyone who truly believes that violence is a solution to any problem.

Select to expand quote

myscreenname said..
Is Paul Keating right about the subs?

"The worst deal in all history" he said.

$368bn on 8 subs or $32k on one bitcoin. Its a close call.

Gough Whitlam bought Blue Poles for $1m. Everyone thought he was a freak. Now it's worth about 14,000 Bitcoin.

Anthony Albonese is a dunderhead. He doesn't understand investments.

Select to expand quote

Carantoc said..
So...right...

I am thinking there might be about $368bn of opportunity coming up that could do for Carantoc what bitcoin investment did for myscreenname.

I realise a large chunk of that $368bn might already be set aside for consulting services from Macroscienc, but I'm sure there is a little left over if I can provide some positive input.

Problem is I know nothing not much about subs. So I was wondering if anyone here could peer review my ideas before I submit them formally.

Idea 1) make 'em water tight
Idea 2) don't design the missiles based on a boomerang

Yep, if somebody pay me just one of those 368 I could make some alternations and improvements to our subs.
First instead to avoid sinking of heavy metal (uranium 238) I will make them flying high in sky and call them nuclear powered airships. Or just ballons. Obviously visual effect on enemy will be extremely different. As to stealth our sub or air ship will be equally useless .
Ps just read nice article about neutrinos that all nuclear reactors produce and detectors that could detect those from any distance you like . A meter , hundred km or light year away.
This time I totally agree that buying now Bitcoins for those 500 bln today could be much better investment for our country.Interestingly modern diesel sub could become completely noiseless and harder to detect but nuclear need constant cooling system working and obviously those neutrinos just advertise your location instantly and constantly.