Flat earth proof

7 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
sls
sls
WA
179 posts
sls sls
WA, 179 posts
31 Dec 2018 11:19pm
petermac33 said..
Put a string from one end of the Suez Canal to the other end and pull tight

Now if it were a ball as Japie is so convinced there'd be a huge elevation of land in the middle.

The middle of the string would be a kilometre or so underwater.

Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?


www.quora.com/Wouldnt-the-Suez-Canal-be-proof-of-a-flat-Earth-At-slightly-over-120-miles-long-the-amount-of-curvature-would-be-9-600-feet-Why-dont-we-see-it

Plenty of answers here. Below is the shortest, most obvious.




decrepit
decrepit
WA
12872 posts
WA, 12872 posts
31 Dec 2018 11:20pm
petermac33 said..
Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?

Of course it's perfectly horizontal idiot, other wise the water would all run up one end, wouldn't it???????
But it also follows the earths curvature, other wise it would be going up hill at the ends.

You still don't get curved level do you?

Just get it into your head.

HORIZONTAL doesn't = STRAIGHT.

They are two different things altogether.
Straight is a line connecting the shortest distance between two points.

Horizontal is a line at right angles to the line to the centre of gravity. And this line is curved!
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
1 Jan 2019 11:49am
I can see that the first structure is the top of a ship but I reckon that the stuff in the background is Chicago





FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
1 Jan 2019 12:38pm
japie said..
I can see that the first structure is the top of a ship but I reckon that the stuff in the background is Chicago







Lol!....

but you are wrong. That's an ice wall you are seeing there. Its so obvious a child can see it. It makes sense really as with a flat earth you would see a few smaller mountains but then the ice wall would dominate.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
1 Jan 2019 12:39pm
sls said..
petermac33 said..
Put a string from one end of the Suez Canal to the other end and pull tight

Now if it were a ball as Japie is so convinced there'd be a huge elevation of land in the middle.

The middle of the string would be a kilometre or so underwater.

Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?


www.quora.com/Wouldnt-the-Suez-Canal-be-proof-of-a-flat-Earth-At-slightly-over-120-miles-long-the-amount-of-curvature-would-be-9-600-feet-Why-dont-we-see-it

Plenty of answers here. Below is the shortest, most obvious.






Obviously not shot through a telescope. Derr!

NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
1 Jan 2019 2:48pm
FormulaNova said..

japie said..
I can see that the first structure is the top of a ship but I reckon that the stuff in the background is Chicago







Lol!....

but you are wrong. That's an ice wall you are seeing there. Its so obvious a child can see it. It makes sense really as with a flat earth you would see a few smaller mountains but then the ice wall would dominate.


So not flat but wavey. So THAT'S why there is always a horizon.
albers
albers
NSW
1739 posts
NSW, 1739 posts
1 Jan 2019 7:56pm
The P900 will bring everything back into view.

PS: It actually sees into the future as well

Rupert
Rupert
TAS
2967 posts
TAS, 2967 posts
1 Jan 2019 9:42pm
petermac33 said..
Put a string from one end of the Suez Canal to the other end and pull tight

Now if it were a ball as Japie is so convinced there'd be a huge elevation of land in the middle.

The middle of the string would be a kilometre or so underwater.

Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?






DelFuego
DelFuego
WA
213 posts
WA, 213 posts
1 Jan 2019 11:14pm
Ok ill bite
Omfg !!!!!!!
you flat earthers really are simpletons.
A surveyor could explain to you but i dont think you are able to comprehend.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
2 Jan 2019 8:52am
Rupert said..


I thought they stopped after they thought nothing could top 911 commission report... maybe they just wanted a change.


DelFuego said..
Ok ill bite
Omfg !!!!!!!
you flat earthers really are simpletons.
A surveyor could explain to you but i dont think you are able to comprehend.

That's the way people feel about some other stories.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅