blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/dont-fall-prey-to-scaremongering-about-5g/
at least this guys is a physicist.

Select to expand quote

petermac33 said..
blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/?amp

Beaten to the punch by ....that much.

Bravo Sir.

From the same website petie but it seems you must have missed this one.

"Don't fall prey to scaremongering about 5G" by David Robert Grimes.

David Robert Grimes is a cancer researcher, physicist, and John Maddox Prize-winning science writer. He is based at Dublin City University and is a visiting researcher at the University of Oxford. He advises, across Europe, on the public understanding of science, particularly on vaccination policy and combatting cancer misinformation. His first book, The Irrational Ape: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk, and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World,

blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/dont-fall-prey-to-scaremongering-about-5g/

Another physicist albeit a ddg one

#fauxfullscreen

Select to expand quote

petermac33 said..
Another physicist albeit a ddg one

I think you spelled "dodgey" wrong, although I can see why you would be drawn to her. Can you give us a brief rundown on the clip above as I don't have over 2 hours to watch it.

Dr. Katherine Horton is a former particle physicist and the leader of the international Joint Investigation Team, which is examining Secret Service criminality and systemic corruption. Her team of experts is investigating a global criminal program run by Western Secret Services in which the civilian population is assaulted and often murdered with Directed Energy Weapons, covertly implanted with military biotechnology and mentally crippled with neurotechnology.

5G has a higher frequency from 2.6 GHz to 28 GHz, compared to 700-2500 used by 4G.

She mentions they are planning on putting antenna / towers every 100 metres or so which is scary in itself.

Also the radiation pulses which she said it is of an added concern.

This info is beyond my understanding. I am just regurgitating what the experts are telling me as well as the numerous testimonies of harm.

Select to expand quote

petermac33 said..
experts

There are none or at least very few smarter than Sir Isaac Newton ... but he was kook and believed all sorts on nutty crap. Which influenced his work. What we'd call these days "an agenda" ;)

Petermac are you a russian plant in seabreeze?

www.nytimes.com/2019/05/12/science/5g-phone-safety-health-russia.html

amp.smh.com.au/world/oceania/russian-propaganda-stoking-5g-health-fears-in-australia-20190916-p52rmc.html

Select to expand quote

petermac33 said..
5G has a higher frequency from 2.6 GHz to 28 GHz, compared to 700-2500 used by 4G.

She mentions they are planning on putting antenna / towers every 100 metres or so which is scary in itself.

Also the radiation pulses which she said it is of an added concern.

This info is beyond my understanding. I am just regurgitating what the experts are telling me as well as the numerous testimonies of harm.

That's good to know.
The low frequencies cause damage and penetrate deeper or through your body so all go for 5g for me.