Select to expand quote
BWalnut said..
I've been thinking a lot about how we all likely desire something a little different from reviews. Radical footage, technical details, honest assessments, critical feedback, average Joe reports. There's a wide spectrum of information that can be included.
Personally, I lean hard on technical elements. Shapes, dimensions, setup details. Leaning on the numbers at the start strips away the marketing hype and gives me something objective to solidify my thought on. I also put a lot of value in review duration. Ideally 500 miles (800km) for any comprehensive review. 1000 miles (1600km) is even better as I think longer reviews reveal durability, as well as the little quirks and nuanced tricks that can only be found with time on foil in a variety of conditions.
I put less value in ride footage. I want to know the riders dims and style but beyond that I rarely see meaningful changes in ride footage from one video to the next of the same foiler.
I'm curious where others land. What makes a review truly valuable to you, and what is just noise?
I'm similar to you, like facts. Real world experience of good and bad. less use of "awesome" " transforming" " best ever" " game changer"
there are always things that can be improved and not minor things like colour ( unless a PW).
Comparing to other products in same ball park, see how they stack up. transparency, what is the hidden hand giving.