Please note: We are temporarily in maintenance mode, and some features, such as Buy&Sell, Forums and Messaging are temporarily offline. Back soon!

Forums > Windsurfing General

Mast Compatibility with different lengths.

Reply
Created by DSeadog > 9 months ago, 6 Mar 2013
DSeadog
NSW, 17 posts
6 Mar 2013 1:46PM
Thumbs Up

Presently I have a 2 Neil Pyrde X60 masts. One is 400 and the other 460cm. What does everyone think about using say the bottom half of the 460 and the top half of the 400 to give me a 430 mast?

Mark _australia
WA, 23526 posts
6 Mar 2013 11:00AM
Thumbs Up

Some brands like Ezzy are designed to do that ......... but I doubt the NP is.

The main thing is the join needs to be snug - not tight, not loose. If too loose it will damage the mast, if tighter than usual it will probably not want to come apart afterwards.

If the join fits correctly, why not try it?

Windxtasy
WA, 4017 posts
6 Mar 2013 11:10AM
Thumbs Up

The bend curve is different for different length masts. Your two halves will bend differently. It may work or it may not, depending on the luff curve of the sail.

Bender
WA, 2236 posts
6 Mar 2013 11:13AM
Thumbs Up

It will work nicely

www.peterman.dk/windsurf-NP-X6-mast-study-780gb.htm

FormulaNova
WA, 15090 posts
6 Mar 2013 7:54PM
Thumbs Up

Being bored one day, I tried this with the Ezzy RDMs I have. Ezzy only recommend that when doing this that the tip is the longer length, and the base the shortest.

I rigged my sails using the normal masts, then the longer tip/shorter base combo, and then the shorter tip with longer base combination.

The shorter tip with longer base did not work very well at all. The shapes of the sails were all wrong, and the cammed sails would not rotate. The longer tip with shorter base looked the same as the correct/equal length masts.

Even though you are going to use NP masts, (and it sounds like they are meant to match ferrule sizes, based on Bender's link) I think you will run into the same problem, where the longest section needs to be for the top and the shortest for the bottom. I expect the reverse will not work at all.

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
6 Mar 2013 11:50PM
Thumbs Up

After snapping the bottom of an x3 430 and a top of a 460 (or was it the other way around?) I used them together for my smaller sails for a couple of years without an issue. As mentioned - the fit was loose so I cut up an empty silicone tube to use as a shim! Worked fine.

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
6 Mar 2013 9:17PM
Thumbs Up

FormulaNova said...
Being bored one day, I tried this with the Ezzy RDMs I have. Ezzy only recommend that when doing this that the tip is the longer length, and the base the shortest.

I rigged my sails using the normal masts, then the longer tip/shorter base combo, and then the shorter tip with longer base combination.

The shorter tip with longer base did not work very well at all. The shapes of the sails were all wrong, and the cammed sails would not rotate. The longer tip with shorter base looked the same as the correct/equal length masts.

Even though you are going to use NP masts, (and it sounds like they are meant to match ferrule sizes, based on Bender's link) I think you will run into the same problem, where the longest section needs to be for the top and the shortest for the bottom. I expect the reverse will not work at all.


Agree that long top/short bottom combo would be best, though info below on peterman.dk website (Benders link) indicates that reverse would still be ok for NP sails if you can cope with the mast being even more flex-top than normal:

Now, because the Neil Pryde X6 mast series is placed in one end of the bend curve scale (with soft tops), this means that there are limits to the otherwise great potential of the masts, as one of the options (bottom from the longer mast/top from the shorter mast) generally grows way too Flex Top for all other sails but Neil Pryde. The other option (bottom from the shorter mast/top from the longer mast) has a great chance of covering the needs of sails from other companies.

I've tested the X6 cross-fit over many years using a 430 base & 400 top with NP sails under 5.4m. Worked great in a 4.7 Combat with std fixed head but tried the same combo in a 4.4 Combat that had an adjustable head fitted and was terrible!

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
6 Mar 2013 9:40PM
Thumbs Up



Dunno bout that as the peterman.dk study examines cross-fitting pairs of NP masts in 30cm increments, i.e. 400/430, 430/460, 460/490 etc and not the bigger 60cm increment that DSeadog mentions (400/460). Think the bend curve of each half would create a mismatch and would likely play havoc with the designed shape of a sail, particularly in the mid-section. If you're gonna try it, make sure you do it with an NP sail!

DSeadog
NSW, 17 posts
7 Mar 2013 8:49AM
Thumbs Up

Thanks for all the tips everyone. The 400 and 460 don't really fit together very well, but it is interesting that I could pair a 400 with a 430 tip and that would enable me to purchase a new NP 6.2m without having to fork out for a full mast. I had decent prang on my North spectro 6.0m and blew the top panel out, the sail is finished. (Was 22 years old however).

FormulaNova
WA, 15090 posts
7 Mar 2013 6:43AM
Thumbs Up

GazMan said...
FormulaNova said...

Even though you are going to use NP masts, (and it sounds like they are meant to match ferrule sizes, based on Bender's link) I think you will run into the same problem, where the longest section needs to be for the top and the shortest for the bottom. I expect the reverse will not work at all.


Agree that long top/short bottom combo would be best, though info below on peterman.dk website (Benders link) indicates that reverse would still be ok for NP sails if you can cope with the mast being even more flex-top than normal:

Now, because the Neil Pryde X6 mast series is placed in one end of the bend curve scale (with soft tops), this means that there are limits to the otherwise great potential of the masts, as one of the options (bottom from the longer mast/top from the shorter mast) generally grows way too Flex Top for all other sails but Neil Pryde. The other option (bottom from the shorter mast/top from the longer mast) has a great chance of covering the needs of sails from other companies.



Even though he says the longer bottom and shorter top will be even more flex top, in practice for the sails I was using, it was completely wrong. Sure, in theory the top is softer, but the bottom half was stiffer and was now 30cm longer. This really stuffed up the shape of the sail.

As with anything, you don't know what it is going to rig like until you try it though. I think it would also be more forgiving on wave sails.

jimbob SA
SA, 1000 posts
7 Mar 2013 9:27AM
Thumbs Up

fibrespar tidalwave tops will also fit onto the sdm pryde bottoms, i have for a few years ran a 400 fibrespar top over a 430 X3 cut down 20 bottom, have used this on my old 4.7 and 5.0 ezzy waves and all the tine on my 07 KA Koncept for speed, works well only rotation is a bit stiff when wind on lighter side but swapped to pryde cams and was then all good, latelyhave run this on an 08 Koncept and its works fantastic witn no changes and actually looks better than my bigger sails with the correct KA masts, have had good results with this combo over the years and done over 42 with this mast combo last week.

Edit - I have a X3 430 top sitting in the shed doing nothing if you want it sailhack.

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
7 Mar 2013 6:00PM
Thumbs Up

Thanks Jamie, but I've gone away from cams & now only run RDMs - although the buzz of a cammed sail on a SDM still lingers. I'm sure that there are a few out there that will take you up on your offer.

GazMan
WA, 847 posts
7 Mar 2013 6:32PM
Thumbs Up

jimbob SA said...
fibrespar tidalwave tops will also fit onto the sdm pryde bottoms, i have for a few years ran a 400 fibrespar top over a 430 X3 cut down 20 bottom, have used this on my old 4.7 and 5.0 ezzy waves and all the tine on my 07 KA Koncept for speed, works well only rotation is a bit stiff when wind on lighter side but swapped to pryde cams and was then all good, latelyhave run this on an 08 Koncept and its works fantastic witn no changes and actually looks better than my bigger sails with the correct KA masts, have had good results with this combo over the years and done over 42 with this mast combo last week.

Edit - I have a X3 430 top sitting in the shed doing nothing if you want it sailhack.


Would be careful mixing NP X3 and X3 mast halves as the masts themselves appear to rig quite differently. Originally owned a 430 X3 from new and never really felt right in the NP Excess I was using at the time. Traded up to a new X6 and sail performed considerably better (maybe the particular X3 mast was a dud?).

As said before, only way to know is to try it out on the water!



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing General


"Mast Compatibility with different lengths." started by DSeadog