Please note: We are temporarily in maintenance mode, and some features, such as Buy&Sell, Forums and Messaging are temporarily offline. Back soon!

Forums > Windsurfing General

100 ltr all-rounder?

Reply
Created by PhilSWR > 9 months ago, 19 Jul 2012
PhilSWR
NSW, 1104 posts
19 Jul 2012 3:23PM
Thumbs Up

I currently have two boards- 1) a 117 lt F2 Stoke and a 85 ltr Quatro. I'd consider myself a learner to intermediate rider ( been sailing for 7 months), and I'm pretty comfortable on the Stoke in waves and flatwater, and feel horrid on the Quatro. Took them both out in the surf today (rolling chest high) and had fun on the Stoke (despite it's high-speed flatwater pedigree) but find it a tad stiff through the turns on waves. I then jumped on the Quatro. Totally the other extreme. Super loose, can get in straps pretty easy, but it's a serious handful to control. Reminds me of a snowboard on a frosty hand-rail. Absolutely no doubt in the right hands it would be leathal, but I'm basically not good enough to ride it comfortably in the surf yet- probably a year off I'd reckon. Anyway, my question; is there a board round 100 ltrs that you'd consider a good all-rounder, with a bias for wave riding? And to make things more difficult, ideally a few years old so I could track down one second hand one.

PS- I weigh 78 kilos.

Any info would be great.

Cheers.

mr love
VIC, 2415 posts
19 Jul 2012 3:54PM
Thumbs Up

I don't think you could go wrong with any Freestyle wave board from the last 3 years in that size. I have an RRD FSW 96 and find it the perfect allrounder for choppy bay conditions and for "veggie" wave sailing which sums me up. All the other brands have equally versatile boards.

jh2703
NSW, 1225 posts
19 Jul 2012 5:00PM
Thumbs Up

Get your self a quad for the waves, JP have a 99 for 2013 and fanatic have a 101. Quads have changed my sailing and all for the best. Freestyle waves are too much of a compromise for the waves, Don't get me wrong I've got three of them but if you want a wave board get a quad.

....my 2 cents, now let the negative nellys respond.

Waiting4wind
NSW, 1871 posts
19 Jul 2012 5:01PM
Thumbs Up

A FSW board is the go and every brand has one but some are looser than others. They do ride bigger than a wave board so for your 78kg a 100L board will be on the biggish side.

A FSW 90-96L would be good. You may be best to try and demo one at your local shop to get a feel for the size.

You could even try a stiffer / bigger fin on your Quatro, this will make it less skittish and less lively, so it may be easier to get used to.

PhilSWR
NSW, 1104 posts
19 Jul 2012 5:24PM
Thumbs Up

Thanks guys for the replys. I reckon the Quatro will be great once I improve some more, but for now I feel ( ability-wise) I'm right between the two. Thought about the different fin for the Quatro, but I think it's partly the lack of volume that makes it tough going. I'd still like to be able to up-haul if the wind drops out- hence a bit more volume- and the Quatro is hard work in that department with my skills -especially on the ocean.

I just put a more wave orientated fin in the Stoke as I was using it with a 35 cm JP Carve. This fin- a 29 JP Freestyle Wave- may loosen it up. I'll find out tomorrow I hope! Whilst probably not the solution, it may make the board more enjoyable in the suds.

But I'm still keen on a smaller size / volume wave biased board, unfortunely up here there's no real option to try a few models.

I'm still talking used, as I can't really afford a new board right now, and I think in time I'll gain the skills to ride the 85 lt Quatro in the surf anyway.

Cheers for the info so far.

Bertie
NSW, 1351 posts
19 Jul 2012 6:14PM
Thumbs Up

just get a freestyle wave 95-100L. They will help you get gybes sorted too. all brands of FSW are pretty good just avoid an gimicky stuff, and make sure the fin isnt too big.

keep the wave board for real waves later on once the skills come up a touch.
just remember the FSW will hold u back in real waves because of the lack of tail rocker.

stehsegler
WA, 3557 posts
19 Jul 2012 4:20PM
Thumbs Up

I wouldn't get a FSW if I was you. They are just not wave oriented enough. I would get one of the Tri fin / Thruster boards. JP started the trend (well, actually it was Stone in WA that had them first but he only does customs) for production boards and most brands now make them.

I have had a JP 99 for two seasons now. It's a fast board that turns well but you'll need the weight behind it. It's not as snappy as a Quad but it will make up for it with early planning ability and higher top speed... from what you are saying I think you might be well served with a three fin wave board.

Fanatic, RRD, JP, Quatro, Starboard (?), Tabou all do them now. JP and RRD have had them for two seasons and probably have the most experience. As a matter of fact the JP 99 hasn't changed in 3 years because the original shape the first came up with was spot on.

I would suggest though that you try out a 100 l board first. You might find it's actually to big for your weight and a 94 to 92 board would be more suitable.

There are a few popping up on the Seabreeze Buy & Sell section as well.

ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
19 Jul 2012 6:57PM
Thumbs Up

Exocet cross 104. Beautiful board to sail. Will do any think you ask of it.

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
19 Jul 2012 7:00PM
Thumbs Up

Phil, whats the info on the Quatro?

Is it wave specific? What are it's dimensions? how many fins etc? What position do you have the foot straps?

And how many times have you taken it out and with what rig? Also what fin/s are you running in it?

There are a lot of suggestions of getting another board, and something in the mid 90lt range would be a pretty safe bet, but lets check that you aren't jumping the gun too early. Your current boards may well do the gob with a bit of a set up change, and save you a bit of coin.

Waiting4wind
NSW, 1871 posts
19 Jul 2012 7:01PM
Thumbs Up

stehsegler said...

I wouldn't get a FSW if I was you. They are just not wave oriented enough.


Phil said he's a beginner to intermediate and he needs an all rounder!

The FSW is an ideal fit. It will provide good B&J sailing and get him comfortable in small surf until he has the skill to use his wave board. Moreover a mid size FSW will complement his existing quiver nicely as the middle board, a crossover all rounder.

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
19 Jul 2012 7:01PM
Thumbs Up

ikw777 said...

Exocet cross 104. Beautiful board to sail. Will do any think you ask of it.


No, no, no. Hate to disagree, but too large for a 78kg dude that wants to progress in the surf.

He mentions he wants a good all rounder with a bias towards surf. With that in mind I probably wouldn't go a FSW either. If he said he wanted a bias to bump and jump with the occasional surf then FSW would fit the bill. In this case, either go a floaty less radical wave board (single fin or tri fin) or have a look at what you have now and how it might be tuned to your current ability.

ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
19 Jul 2012 7:30PM
Thumbs Up

aus301 said...

ikw777 said...

Exocet cross 104. Beautiful board to sail. Will do any think you ask of it.


No, no, no. Hate to disagree, but too large for a 78kg dude that wants to progress in the surf.

He mentions he wants a good all rounder with a bias towards surf. With that in mind I probably wouldn't go a FSW either. If he said he wanted a bias to bump and jump with the occasional surf then FSW would fit the bill. In this case, either go a floaty less radical wave board (single fin or tri fin) or have a look at what you have now and how it might be tuned to your current ability.


Fair enough, though he did say he couldn't hack the wave board at the moment and found the free ride only a little bit stiff to turn. The cross comes in a 94 too :-)

stehsegler
WA, 3557 posts
19 Jul 2012 6:38PM
Thumbs Up

Waiting4wind said...

stehsegler said...

I wouldn't get a FSW if I was you. They are just not wave oriented enough.

Phil said he's a beginner to intermediate and he needs an all rounder!


yeah... but he also said he wants something more wave oriented and has gone out in shoulder high waves... not too many beginner to intermediate people go out in shoulder high waves. I have a feeling he might be better then he lets on hence why I suggest to him to test a board if he gets the chance.

Don't get me wrong. I LOVE the JP FSW. I highly rate the 92ish versions. IMHO one of the best board shapes of the past 10 years but it's not a very wave oriented board.

jsnfok
WA, 899 posts
19 Jul 2012 8:09PM
Thumbs Up

i would go for a freestyle wave with a couple of different fins

Roar
NSW, 471 posts
19 Jul 2012 11:22PM
Thumbs Up

try and test drive a Tabou Pocket wave.

They tend to have a wider tail so more volum at the back of the board than a FSW type board. makes it much easier to get planing especially for heavier riders.

the tabou pads are really nice for jumping - much more forgiving on the joints thant the JPs ive used.

PhilSWR
NSW, 1104 posts
20 Jul 2012 12:51AM
Thumbs Up

aus301 said...

Phil, whats the info on the Quatro?

Is it wave specific? What are it's dimensions? how many fins etc? What position do you have the foot straps?

And how many times have you taken it out and with what rig? Also what fin/s are you running in it?

There are a lot of suggestions of getting another board, and something in the mid 90lt range would be a pretty safe bet, but lets check that you aren't jumping the gun too early. Your current boards may well do the gob with a bit of a set up change, and save you a bit of coin.


Here's a pic of the Quatro- and one of the more managable Stoke


. It's certainly wave specific, and I know in the right hands it shreds. I've only used it a few times and only with a 5.2 Ezzy wave sail. No pic off the bottom sorry, but it has a single fin. It's 240 cm by 65 cm with most of the volume under your front foot. I think something with a wider tail and 10 lt plus more volume would be good to try. One of those RRD FSW 96 sounds interesting. Sucks living miles from the city and not being able to try different boards...

Thanks everyone for all the info. I've Googled most of the boards mentioned and have plenty of food for thought.

Gwendy
SA, 472 posts
20 Jul 2012 1:07AM
Thumbs Up

stehsegler said...

I would get one of the Tri fin / Thruster boards. JP started the trend (well, actually it was Stone in WA that had them first but he only does customs) for production boards and most brands now make them.





Nothing new about thrusters in sailboards. Had a board called a Stinger in the late 80's that was tri-fin wave. Plastic moulded thing really heavy but good thing in the day. Multiple fins have gone in and out of fashion a few times since then.

Gwendy
SA, 472 posts
20 Jul 2012 1:10AM
Thumbs Up

Hey PhilSWR that rear footstrap on that Quatro looks a long way foreward to me. Any way to move it back?

I'm with Aus301 on this. People seem to be going for huge boards for waves these days. I reckon a 85 ltr board fo a 78kg person is as big as you'd want for waves. Have a good play with set-up. It can make a lot of difference.

aussieboats
NSW, 342 posts
20 Jul 2012 8:57AM
Thumbs Up

HI, phil give me a call at Jordans and will give you an idea of what you need

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
20 Jul 2012 10:04AM
Thumbs Up

PhilSWR said...

Here's a pic of the Quatro- and one of the more managable Stoke


. It's certainly wave specific, and I know in the right hands it shreds. I've only used it a few times and only with a 5.2 Ezzy wave sail. No pic off the bottom sorry, but it has a single fin. It's 240 cm by 65 cm with most of the volume under your front foot. I think something with a wider tail and 10 lt plus more volume would be good to try. One of those RRD FSW 96 sounds interesting. Sucks living miles from the city and not being able to try different boards...

Thanks everyone for all the info. I've Googled most of the boards mentioned and have plenty of food for thought.


Hmmm, 65cm is pretty wide for an 85lt board. Most 85lt boards come in under 60cm wide. With those dimensions I would say the board is super thin, but should still be ok for someone under 80kg on a powered up day - together with the stoke I am guessing you are not after a light wind wave board.

Here are a couple of suggestions to maybe take some of the sting out of the board you have and see if you can persevere with that and save a few $$$. Mast pos looks like it could go back to mid box, especially if using a 5.2. The strap pos could be played with a bit, move the rear strap to either centre or rear position, leave the fonts in the front position. Will give you a slightly wider stance which might suit you - play around with the straps to find what works. Make sure your fin is well back in the box, same as surfing - forward for loose, back for drive. And maybe see what happens if you run a stiffer fin than the one you have.

It sounds like you are having no trouble getting in the straps or planing the board, we just need to turn down the lively meter for you.

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
20 Jul 2012 10:09AM
Thumbs Up

Just did a quick google and found your Quatro FW 85 is a 2006 model and is quoted as being 240 x 58.5. This board was effectively Quatro's Freestyle Wave from that year. Be worth taking that into consideration when thinking about anything newer.

A later model board will be shorter and fatter, but at that volume not necessarily wider.

Waiting4wind
NSW, 1871 posts
20 Jul 2012 12:07PM
Thumbs Up

The Quatro 85 FSW is actually a good board for a 78kg rider wanting to dabble in the waves. The Quattro's are supposed to be more wave oriented FSW's.

I would give the 85 some more TOW. Get out in some flat water which will make it easier to dial in the board, get your stance sorted and get comfortable. As suggested make the board a bit less directional with the suggested fin and strap set up.

I'm 90kg and I use a 94 L Exo Cross in small waves. Even with my weight I do need to weight the rails quite a bit for carving on a wave face, and I'm not talking radical bottom turns or smacking the lip! Thats were you need a dedicated wave board. As soon it hits around 18knots I'm on a 78L FSW.

One of the benefits of a FSW is they are easier to get back up wind for your next ride.

stehsegler
WA, 3557 posts
20 Jul 2012 11:39AM
Thumbs Up

Gwendy said...
Nothing new about thrusters in sailboards. Had a board called a Stinger in the late 80's that was tri-fin wave. Plastic moulded thing really heavy but good thing in the day. Multiple fins have gone in and out of fashion a few times since then.


Agreed... I had a Tencate Fury plastic fantastic board as well. I was cheap, fun and indestructible. However, what has changed is the shape in combination with fin shape and technology. In my opinion these are totally different concepts between then and now.

stehsegler
WA, 3557 posts
20 Jul 2012 11:41AM
Thumbs Up

Waiting4wind said...
One of the benefits of a FSW is they are easier to get back up wind for your next ride.


One of the draw backs is that the scoop on them is usually not enough to prevent your nose from digging in when you take of on a step section of a wave.

Waiting4wind
NSW, 1871 posts
20 Jul 2012 1:59PM
Thumbs Up

stehsegler said...

Waiting4wind said...
One of the benefits of a FSW is they are easier to get back up wind for your next ride.


One of the draw backs is that the scoop on them is usually not enough to prevent your nose from digging in when you take of on a step section of a wave.




Thats true, but it's all about perspective. Someone who has a lot of experience in the waves, like yourself, may take some of the basics for granted as they become second nature with experience.

With my level of wave sailing skill I don't go out in conditions that are too taxing so the limitations of a stiffer flatter board aren't a show stopper. However I do remember the many challenges I used to have with a hard core wave board. eg. getting on the plane, making it track well, punching through the wash, getting up to the break without having to walk up the beach etc etc. Albeit the newer boards are much easier, like the Jp Thruster I had, but it all depends on where you're at.

BTW Phil, nice looking board the Quatro.

jimbob SA
SA, 1000 posts
20 Jul 2012 3:22PM
Thumbs Up

are you really wave sailing or just onshore bump and jump and blasting in the sea.
I have a F2 stoke in that size as well as a 92 jp fsw and would use the F2 9 times out of ten for the above onshore conditions you just need a smaller fin.

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
20 Jul 2012 4:44PM
Thumbs Up

stehsegler said...

Gwendy said...
Nothing new about thrusters in sailboards. Had a board called a Stinger in the late 80's that was tri-fin wave. Plastic moulded thing really heavy but good thing in the day. Multiple fins have gone in and out of fashion a few times since then.


Agreed... I had a Tencate Fury plastic fantastic board as well. I was cheap, fun and indestructible. However, what has changed is the shape in combination with fin shape and technology. In my opinion these are totally different concepts between then and now.


However not so different from the Marty Littlewood Delta boards that were thrusters and seem to go well for at least one east coast rider. That would have been over 10 years ago I guess.

PhilSWR
NSW, 1104 posts
20 Jul 2012 5:07PM
Thumbs Up

Gwendy said...

Hey PhilSWR that rear footstrap on that Quatro looks a long way foreward to me. Any way to move it back?

I'm with Aus301 on this. People seem to be going for huge boards for waves these days. I reckon a 85 ltr board fo a 78kg person is as big as you'd want for waves. Have a good play with set-up. It can make a lot of difference.


Nah, that's as far as it goes back- only one position. I like the 85 lt volume, I just can't handle it yet... More TOW with it for sure.

PhilSWR
NSW, 1104 posts
20 Jul 2012 5:11PM
Thumbs Up

Waiting4wind said...

stehsegler said...

Waiting4wind said...
One of the benefits of a FSW is they are easier to get back up wind for your next ride.


One of the draw backs is that the scoop on them is usually not enough to prevent your nose from digging in when you take of on a step section of a wave.




Thats true, but it's all about perspective. Someone who has a lot of experience in the waves, like yourself, may take some of the basics for granted as they become second nature with experience.

With my level of wave sailing skill I don't go out in conditions that are too taxing so the limitations of a stiffer flatter board aren't a show stopper. However I do remember the many challenges I used to have with a hard core wave board. eg. getting on the plane, making it track well, punching through the wash, getting up to the break without having to walk up the beach etc etc. Albeit the newer boards are much easier, like the Jp Thruster I had, but it all depends on where you're at.

BTW Phil, nice looking board the Quatro.


I'm with you on the conditions and expectations for wave riding, and can relate to what ya saying about planing, tacking etc- the Quatro is all hard work for me at this stage. But I will improve!

PS- It's certainly a sweet looking board. Probably too striking really, as people think I know what I'm doing!

PhilSWR
NSW, 1104 posts
20 Jul 2012 5:17PM
Thumbs Up

jimbob SA said...

are you really wave sailing or just onshore bump and jump and blasting in the sea.
I have a F2 stoke in that size as well as a 92 jp fsw and would use the F2 9 times out of ten for the above onshore conditions you just need a smaller fin.



Normal spilling type waves off a point break. So far nothing bigger than face high. Usually it's waist to chest. . Love the feel of the Stoke in waves- that is till I try and turn sharp off the lip. Drawn out lines off the top is the best I can do. I'll try this freewave fin I have in the F2 next outing and see if that losens it up a tad.

So you're talking bump and jump with the Stoke?



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing General


"100 ltr all-rounder?" started by PhilSWR