Select to expand quote
chrispy said...SP said...Simondo said...SP said..Simondo said...SP said..
what if it is not a human reproducing it but a machine?
Mac said this, "Unless you have the real board on hand or a copy of the file I can't see the fake being close to the original."
:) Did you only skim read it, and miss this bit SP!?
Yes, yes I did...
Actually Mac is slightly wrong... If you have the computer file, you will get pretty close...
Maybe but I didn't wanna reread it,
I think even one of the programs will take a few different angle photos and turn it into a file.
Mac is wrong not slightly....
.going on in another thread. Takayama is being sold as a proper ridgey didge board but the great man has not touched any boards in Australia.
But they would be so close to what he would have shaped....maybe.
I like watching a shaper do his thing. Git the blue walls and light looking for shadows,that I can understand.
The kicker is when it all looks good to him and he picks the board up,passes it through his hands like a 100 point checkpoint..... Then puts it back for a bit more of a sand as it did not feel right.
That experience and knowing "your " shapes

I believe Paul Hutchinson shapes Taks in Aus, or used to. so no slouch on the planer and I reckon a good shaper can pass on their knowledge to someone else, in the old days pre machines ghost shapers were all the go with the big labels.
So I reckon whilst not exact, pretty damn close.
If you think you are buying a board touched by Donald(rip) then your dumb enough to deserve it.. Let's call it the dumb **** tax

The US ones are Taks but his nephew shapes them and learnt from Donald so again pretty damn close, could the average bloke tell the difference???
But I agree will always be not the same as from the original but pretty close , and who cares isn't it about how the surf?
I reckon there is a big difference between a designer of boards and a bloke that can use a planner.