Thanks guys for your input & opinions.
Fishdude. I can hear what your saying. And totally understand what you are saying. The photos make the gaps look more exaggerated with all 3 wedges. And yes there is more pressure on the inside of the boxes but the leverage is minimal if these boxes are set strong. One way to find out. But sure the boxes will hold in my experimental stages before I make a full size epoxy wedge if needed.
And thanks Blue Planet for explaining Angle of Incidence compared to Angle of Attack. So I think that would explain that a mast doesn't necessarily have to be exactly perpendicular, (90 deg.) To the deck. And that may explain why I experienced easy paddle speed & wave catching without the wedge because the wing would have been more parallel with the deck meaning the right angle of attack. But the nose up riding seemed a little odd. But at higher speed & pointing down a wave face I would be putting more downward force on the front of the board.
Jeg. Blue Planet has explained it. And so has the more experienced riders like Piros. Who say a wedge is not needed or very minimal thickness if needed. I think the research & development teams only use the experienced riders to have input into their board designs.
Colas. Yes different designs different angles of attack which equals different adjustments.
Me. I got these wedges to experiment for my benefit to find what is the most comfortable. At this stage it is the 5 to 6mm wedge thickness in the flying stage. But I think this is slowing down my wave catching & early take offs as I had experienced. So am thinking to go down to 4mm wedge to meet halfway between catching & riding.
But. Paddle speed & catching waves early is very appealing & I may even get back down to one wedge or none. Then try to adjust my flying stance to compensate.
Yeah. I can see Piros eyes rolling & saying, " Just put the foil on the board & ride it heaps!" Then make your adjustments. Haaaa!