Select to expand quote
FreeRadical said..
Rental moorings at Rottnest aren't cheap, but it does cover park entry fees and secure moorings. We pay $900 per year for a shared mooring (SMS). Our shared mooring isn't in Thomson Bay, but we can use any mooring at Rottnest as long as we move on if the owner or their designated SMS users come by. It's not a bad system that gives access to as many as possible. There is a designated anchoring area to the East of the Army Jetty.
Im not a lock up the forests greenie, but do think we should take steps to minimise our impact on the environment whilst still enjoying it as much as possible. If there are public or hire moorings available, they should be used. It doesn't matter where and skimping to save a few bucks is really quite selfish. Greographe is not Rottnest, but one day it might be just as crowded, best we take care of all marine environments before they get trashed.
it would be nice if all our marine dollars in Rego and fees went directly back into facilities for us to enjoy and protect the environment, but that's never going to happen.
And when the day comes that Geographe Bay is as crowded as rottness Island a) I will not suggest anchoring AND b) sailing will not be done anymore because there will be no room to move your boat along the coast, seriously have you taken a look at the size of Geographe Bay, certainly there will be areas of crowding at some of the more populated coastal townships, but to crowd the entire Bay would take a damned lot of boats, and yes if the money for Rego and mooring fees went back into facilities for boaties then I would not mind paying for moorings, but as you say it's not going to happen.