I gotta say I love runners for the fine tuning, hate them for lazy days.
Sidenote and query; if you exaggerate the rake on a swept spreader rig it eventually ends up a backstayless design.
If you divide a circle by 3, you'll get 3 x 120 degree sectors, ie: triangulation.
My spreader rake is 117 (so not quite the perfect 120, dunno why), so no need for backstay/s to support the rig.
Some disadvantages I've found though.
The tension in the shrouds is pretty nuts, you need big chain-plates.
The mast will bend far enough when running sometimes that you can grab the forestay and flop it around. Ick.
Admittedly that might be running in 30+ with a full (wire-luffed) kite/staysail/main and the babystay torqued on hard, but it's an unnerving sight none the less.
The mainsail is hindered by the spreaders when running ddw. We don't spend much time sailing ddw anyway being an aso boat, so not much of an issue.

Dumb question number 632: Is there more load pulling forward on a mast from a symmetrical kite, or an assymetrical kite setup?
I'm trying to work out why the chain plates are so big, is it just because that's what you need for wire-luffed asymmetric spinnakers on bowsprits, or because of the lack of a backstay?
Methinks both, but that would mean an aso puts more load on the mast than a symmetrical kite, which I'm struggling to understand.
For that matter, I can't think of a no-backstay with a symmetrical kite boat, the backstayless cat's I can think of are all aso's . Does that say something obvious I'm missing?
Arrgh! All these questions!
SB