Select to expand quote
likuid said..
Anyone tried the new rideengine harnesses ?
Yep - OK here we go!
A couple of the better riders J.V. & M.B in the Bay, have had custom Ride Engine harnesses for a couple of years. I was thinking about ordering one when another friend T.S. got one and soon after had a rib injury from his custom - said he hadn't done it up tight enough. These custom harnesses looked a bit 'prototype' to me - though looking back now - I wish I'd got one!
I've tried and owned about 10 waist harnesses kiting and haven't really liked any of them - though have liked the freedom of sliding hook on the Dynabar (which isn't perfect either). I've always had problems with waist harnesses when it's windy i.e.. riding up and squeezing ribs.
I was heading over to Nth America recently, M.B. told me that Slingshot or some other company were sorting a production version of the Ride Engine, so I tried to get one whilst over there - though they hadn't been released yet.
I was stoked when I saw S.M. on Wednesday who had a brand new Ride Engine Elite Series (L) with a 10" carbon spreader bar. He was awaiting tendon surgery and let me take it. I was relying on it to work - as I wanted the harness to take all the load from my hands (I had a almost 6 week old fractured bone in my right hand - which with my fingers taped together was OK). It was gusting to 48 knots at the lighthouse and was a gusty and wild 35 knots on the water with the surf picking up.
Tried it on in the carpark and couldn't believe how comfortable it was. S.M. adjusted it for me and tightened it up (more about this later) as I couldn't with my tender right hand. I've never had a harness fit so well and it makes sense that a formed or moulded harness does match your back contours - think about how us humans have a convex waist and a concave back. The stiff back of the Ride Engine harness felt like it locked into the right position straight away - could this harness actually stay in position and not ride up? It didn't have that sticky smooth neoprene feeling of the custom, though felt great anyway.
I was overpowered on a 6m Ozone Reo and a surfboard, hadn't kited for close to 2 months and it was the windiest day I've kited since starting 12 years ago. I couldn't believe it - the harness felt unreal, super comfortable and didn't ride up! Wasn't out for that long - though with any other 'normal' soft harness in those conditions I would have had the feeling of being squeezed and the harness riding up. The Ride Engine is the best harness I've tried - the stiff back concept is a winner - I wanted one!!!
HOWEVER, adjusting and tightening... WTF. The way the it does up i.e. the closure is NOT refined. It seems to be not resolved as far as design - with the buckle, straps and the way the plastic covered strap engages with the carbon bar.
It's like they got the body or back of the harness sorted. Then somehow they thought that having a 20mm webbing strap on each side that runs through some 10mm stiff plastic tube that goes around the 2 x 90 degree corners of the carbon bar (which are friction pinch points) and back to a single buckle on each side (that at 20mm looks like it could be a weak point) to make the adjustment? Have they done this just so you have to use one of their spreader bars? If so - really (hey guys it doesn't work very well) and why?
The other side (the left when on) of the bar has the same system, and this is to centre the bar on the harness for the individual rider - this is something that you cannot really adjust very easily either.
I tried the harness again for another short session two days later in less wind though again really gusty. I had to walk up the beach with the kite near 12 o'clock and could feel that there wasn't the same amount of travel on the carbon spreader bar as my Dynabar (later measured about 7" travel on the 10" Carbon spreader bar vs. about 9.5" travel on the 11" Dynabar). This difference meant I could feel the Ride Engine harness want to spin around my waist a bit more than when using my own NP harness with the Dynabar.
The way the Ride Engine harness has a big pad of velcro on the back of the spreader bar which in effect is like one enclosure instead of two that most harness have - I wasn't sure if this is a good idea. I could hear the velcro under tension and party releasing when walking up the beach with the harness under 12 o clock twisting load in gusty winds. It's not like it was going to undo or anything - though I prefer the way most other harness do up with two tongues of elasticised velcro to position the harness tight - before you get the spreader bar tight.
My conclusion - if Ride Engine had done a better job with the adjustment straps and interface with the spreader bar it would have been an excellent harness. The stiff back and the way it fits your back and doesn't ride up - makes it worth getting anyway (depending on the price), though hopefully the next model with address these issues and offer a bigger range of travel on the bar and use a rope that is easier to tighten when it stretches?
Note: I'm not affiliated with any brand or any shop and have been kitesurfing since 2003. Before that I windsurfed for close to 25 years and would have had a new harness most years. I studied Industrial Design and I designed an integrated windsurfing harness / wetsuit with either buoyancy or weight in 1990 that was prototyped - though never put into production. It used a ski boot buckle system for tensioning the 'straps'. Perhaps Ride Engine could look at something similar to adjust and tighten??
Having now had a good look through the Ride Engine Facebook site - I agree that Coleman has really designed the first harness that actually works for kitesurfing - the stiff back was / is REVOLUTIONARY! Something about getting one chance to get a first impression ... the Ride Engine harness is good though needs improvement IMO!?