Select to expand quote
Mark _australia said..
I still don't care if they are accurate to a ****teenth of a micron.
Finboxes are glass reinforced and I wonder if any of the 3D printing materials are as good. AFAIK they can't run fibres thru it as they print?
The closest thing would be ASA and it still has bonding issues with resins just like current boxes so you're not achieving anything.
So considering a US box is $20, and Power / Tuttle / Mini Tuttle can all be made easily by wrapping some glass around a fin head and then buttering it with filler, then ripping the fin out ..... I really don't see the point!
You can make a tuttle box with $10 materials in a few minutes. So what's the attraction?
I don't think the Chinook finboxes are reinforced. They are some kind of plastic (ABS?). When you cut through them there seems to be no evidence of fibres.
As for 3d printing or the like, I think eventually you will get to a stage where you can build things with fibres. Imagine a board being built with one dot of divinycell at a time, and one dot of resin, and fibres spread through in the direction of the stresses. It sounds achievable to me.
All good for one-off or prototyping, but I imagine it would take a while to be better than mass production using existing techniques.