There is famous saying that:
"Nuclear Controlled Fusion Reactor is great stuff we are only 20 years away to get it done
and ... always will be."
Why is that?
One may say because scientist job is like prostitute nowadays.
Getting paid to get laid.
Scientists are employed and paid to get work done.But when they do approach fundamental problem there are money then can get force you to invent EMC2 again and again.
Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)
Any difference in meaning of both?

www.scientificamerican.com/article/worlds-largest-nuclear-fusion-experiment-clears-milestone/


Obviously to argue thesis above you need to prove that there is something wrong with the oldest profession on Earth. Good lucky

Select to expand quote

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

Select to expand quote

Rupert said..

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

No, just asking for your thought on the subject.
If you have any.
If not, that is fine too.
Did you found a picture of Tokamak offensive?

Going back to your question. As a native english speaker do you feel any difference between those two words?
Scientist and Researcher?
or they just mean for you the same?

well , subject is more interesting then one may initially thought.
I would argue that first profession and researcher rewards goes to the one that invented FIRE.
ot just took care of that...
That may be more essential for human race survival that anything else...
That my thought, Rupert, if you did ask....

Fireman or Firewomen ! that the oldest for me!

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

Rupert said..

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

No, just asking for your thought on the subject.
If you have any.
If not, that is fine too.
Did you found a picture of Tokamak offensive?

Problem is we can't figure out what the subject is. Theoretical physics or prostitutes. If it's the latter I'm sure you'll get a more engaging and informative response.

Select to expand quote

Chris6791 said..

Macroscien said..

Rupert said..

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

No, just asking for your thought on the subject.
If you have any.
If not, that is fine too.
Did you found a picture of Tokamak offensive?

Problem is we can't figure out what the subject is. Theoretical physics or prostitutes. If it's the latter I'm sure you'll get a more engaging and informative response.

That depend when now your first or last impression is activated. Both subjects equally fascinating.
To be fair I did expect ,
the first reaction from people like you ( no offence please)
will be strong protest against comparison used "scientist" to "prostitute".
anu thought on that?

Select to expand quote

Rupert said..

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

Stop it I say, stop it. DO NOT feed the troll!

More relevant question is why Trump allows such bad language in Scientific American video. Should be speaking like Californian Stanford Lab Prostitute, not like educated London shoe salesman

Select to expand quote

UncleBob said..

Rupert said..

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

Stop it I say, stop it. DO NOT feed the troll!

wrong, again Bob.
Toll by design appeal to somebody emotions,
I am asking your thoughts on the subject.
( sorry not yours in particular because you have none thoughts at all)
BTW have you been ever right or had something to say ( that make any sense) .You appear to be main TROLL on SB here, Appear on any subject and topic uninvited only to dispers emotion (negative or course)

Select to expand quote

Rupert said..

Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

No Rupert, I highly value your common sense.
That you bring much order to multiple threads.
I will never fight you ( unless provoked obviously )

Select to expand quote

Mr Milk said..
More relevant question is why Trump allows such bad language in Scientific American video. Should be speaking like Californian Stanford Lab Prostitute, not like educated London shoe salesman

Real scientists possibly feeds in numbers and formulas. Hard to guess even nationality when scribing something on the black board..

Take Schrodinger for example



or Stephen Hawking
what accent did he have ? telephone boot?



You are lucky never to hear me speaking ! not qualified enough under any of those categories above ??

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

UncleBob said..

Rupert said..

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

Stop it I say, stop it. DO NOT feed the troll!

wrong, again Bob.
Toll by design appeal to somebody emotions,
I am asking your thoughts on the subject.
( sorry not yours in particular because you have none thoughts at all)
BTW have you been ever right or had something to say ( that make any sense) .You appear to be main TROLL on SB here, Appear on any subject and topic uninvited only to dispers emotion (negative or course)

Why thank you micro mind, your response indicates that you are somewhat over my calling out your obvious trolling and chinese propaganda that you manage to insert into every thread in which you post.

Select to expand quote

UncleBob said..

Stop it I say, stop it.

Do you realize that what you are doing is classified
as interference with our
Great Aussie Freedom of Speech Guarantee Amendment !
Self proclaimed Uncle Sam Bob telling us what could say and think here in Australia?
Your offence is punishable by 5 hours sitting your bare ass
on Fire Red Ants nest.


Anyway I will better ask our supervisor to remind you roles on SB posts.
If the only reason is aggravation and offending, you may be better go fishing.

This rule is covered by our Second Amendment if you don't know already:.
Prohibiting of exposing your naked stupidity in public.

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

UncleBob said..

Stop it I say, stop it.

Do you realize that what you are doing is classified
as interference with our
Great Aussie Freedom of Speech Guarantee Amendment !
Self proclaimed Uncle Sam Bob telling us what could say and think here in Australia?
Your offence is punishable by 5 hours sitting your bare ass
on Fire Red Ants nest.


Anyway I will better ask our supervisor to remind you roles on SB posts.
If the only reason is aggravation and offending, you may be better go fishing.

This rule is covered by our Second Amendment if you don't know already:.
Prohibiting of exposing your naked stupidity in public.

Oh dear, you really don't appreciate being called out for what you are do you??

Your mum has the oldest profession in the world, and the only Phd she has is in rubbing one out, and thats not in making a friction fire

This time I feel like complete idiot
I am going to sleep and you both keep company entertained .
Bye

Select to expand quote

Rupert said..

what you're on about.

Hi Rupert, It is me again. I decided to withdraw from " discussion with trolls" and topic
but before do so
I owe you explanation what it is/was about.

Indeed humanity is waiting for new unlimited source of free energy. Nuclear Fusion;
The same the power our Sun. The problem is that fifty years already we know what we need to do.
Everybody promise to deliver new power plant to supply us with unlimited clean energy. But somehow, after all those years and billions spend we are not any closer!

My thesis is that maybe people engaged to design and build this power plant are not up to challenge (?) Most of the smartest people go now to do business on New York stock market and money.

Second trench go to politics - to get prestige and some money on side too.

Third to military- to get power.

Fourth maybe goes to science, due to lack of funds for education and research.

My camouflaged question was easy:

Do people go into science and research because of money or because love to discover something new?



Same dilemma , question could apply to all other trades and job.
Farmer, fireman, nurse , teacher . Work for money only or some other satisfaction ?

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

Rupert said..

what you're on about.

Hi Rupert, It is me again. I decided to withdraw from " discussion with trolls" and topic
but before do so
I owe you explanation what it is/was about.

Indeed humanity is waiting for new unlimited source of free energy. Nuclear Fusion;
The same the power our Sun. The problem is that fifty years already we know what we need to do.
Everybody promise to deliver new power plant to supply us with unlimited clean energy. But somehow, after all those years and billions spend we are not any closer!

My thesis is that maybe people engaged to design and build this power plant are not up to challenge (?) Most of the smartest people go now to do business on New York stock market and money.

Second trench go to politics - to get prestige and some money on side too.

Third to military- to get power.

Fourth maybe goes to science, due to lack of funds for education and research.

My camouflaged question was easy:

Do people go into science and research because of money or because love to discover something new?



Same dilemma , question could apply to all other trades and job.
Farmer, fireman, nurse , teacher . Work for money only or some other satisfaction ?

Perhaps if you had asked the question thus initially a sensible and interesting discussion would have ensued, instead of posing pseudo scientific mumbo jumbo and then hurling insults and innuendo at those that participated with whom you disagreed.

Select to expand quote

Formule Nove said recently
..but our planet is saved. We have a time traveling e-catamaran farmer, so we are all saved. Can I hear a 'hallelejah'!

Think about this again Formula SuperNova.
My status on the Earth could be described as Neutral Observer,

To observe and report.My task may never be easier!

Everything you type on your computer or internet is already propagated across Universe in electromagnetic waves format.

Ready for everybody to read (that poses technology required) .

Do you think that Extraterrestrials somewhere there are going few hundred parsecs to save you ass ?

When incoming Armageddon strikes ?

There could be only one the SMARTEST person on one planet.

Ooops/ Stephen Hawkings just get missing.....






No worries , Stephen. Our meeting is still on schedule , as planned. Your birthday party.

Select to expand quote

UncleBob said..

some nonsense again.

A hundred years ago,
your diagnose could be easy, Bob.
According to Dr Sigmund Freud

Everything was about
Small Penis Complex.
But today?
Is even easier !
Send us link to your
Pornhub posts, Bob.
For public to decide.

Select to expand quote

Chris_M said..
Your mum has the oldest profession in the world, and the only Phd she has is in rubbing one out, and thats not in making a friction fire

Which reminds me of the old joke.
What does it mean if you smoke after sex?

You should have used a water based lube.

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

The thing about crazy people, is that they still seem like crazy people to smart people.

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

UncleBob said..

some nonsense again.

A hundred years ago,
your diagnose could be easy, Bob.
According to Dr Sigmund Freud

Everything was about
Small Penis Complex.
But today?
Is even easier !
Send us link to your
Pornhub posts, Bob.
For public to decide.

If this is the best trolling you can manage today then what can I say, except WOW, what a piss poor attempt.
I must admit, I don't visit your recommended "Pornhub" site, is this where your mother performs?

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

Rupert said..

petermacrosian33 said; "Maybe I am wrong , confused word scientist with researcher (?)"

No just plain barking nuts!

What's this the third or fourth thread you're spouting incoherent gobblygook on that nobody has a clue what you're on about.
Is this the latest update on you weird social experiment?

No, just asking for your thought on the subject.
If you have any.
If not, that is fine too.
Did you found a picture of Tokamak offensive?

Going back to your question. As a native english speaker do you feel any difference between those two words?
Scientist and Researcher?
or they just mean for you the same?

Scientists have to be researchers but researchers don't have to be scientists.

Is there a prize?

Make the bad man stop . . . . . . .

Select to expand quote

UncleBob said.
I must admit, I don't visit "Pornhub" site

Maybe you should,
world will be safer place if you splash your anger there.

Anyway.

If that was Netflix satire program for a change
people may think they pay you a fortune here,
as a comedian.
The funny is that you
make a dumb fool of yourself here
completely free of charge
for people to laugh.

Select to expand quote

FormulaNova said..

Macroscien said..

The thing about crazy people, is that they still seem like crazy people to smart people.

That is at least some worth try, SuperNove
Trying to improve over Hawking!?
one more attempt over Einstein and Nobel is yours !

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

UncleBob said.
I must admit, I don't visit "Pornhub" site

Maybe you should,
world will be safer place if you splash your anger there.

Anyway.

If that was Netflix satire program for a change
people may think you earn a fortune here,
as a comedian.
The funny is that you
make a fool of yourself here
completely free of charge
for people to laugh.

Oh dear, you really are a poor demented soul, complain vehemently about people trolling you and then you proceed to troll anyone that shows you up for what you are.
BTW does your mum perform regularly or only for a select audience approved by you?
Oh and perhaps you should embrace the habit of quoting the whole post of others, not the edited or created story that best suits the story that you are attempting to portray.
Have a nice night.

Select to expand quote

Macroscien said..

FormulaNova said..

Macroscien said..

The thing about crazy people, is that they still seem like crazy people to smart people.

That is at least some worth try, SuperNove
Trying to improve over Hawking!?
one more attempt over Einstein and Nobel is yours !

You are being arrogant or stupid and assuming that the reverse of Hawking's statement is true. It wouldn't take an intellectual to see the error in your interpretation of that statement.

Select to expand quote

UncleBob said..

mum perform regularly

Don't you have any mercy over yourself?
Your mates are smiling
Kids laughing
Bos will give a leave too...

clown that is not funny

Select to expand quote

FormulaNova said..

Macroscien said..

FormulaNova said..

Macroscien said..

The thing about crazy people, is that they still seem like crazy people to smart people.

That is at least some worth try, SuperNove
Trying to improve over Hawking!?
one more attempt over Einstein and Nobel is yours !

You are being arrogant or stupid and assuming that the reverse of Hawking's statement is true. It wouldn't take an intellectual to see the error in your interpretation of that statement.

That is getting even more interesting.
You are claiming to be now be smarter the smartest guy no planet.
Who are you SuperNove?