Back to top

New Discovery On Babylonian Mathematics

Created by Adriano Adriano  > 9 months ago, 25 Aug 2017
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Adriano
Adriano

11206 posts

25 Aug 2017 10:39am
The Babs knew about the right angled triangle theorem (previously credited to Pythagoras) and made the world's first trig tablet.

So they knew it's theorem 1,000 previous to Pythagoras and more important, were able to avoid fractions by using base 60 rather than decimals.

Interesting.

rockmagnet
rockmagnet

QLD

1458 posts

25 Aug 2017 1:55pm
Think that it's probably a prop from Stargate
Cambodge
Cambodge

VIC

851 posts

25 Aug 2017 2:21pm
Clearly faked for their conspiracy purposes.
albers
albers

NSW

1739 posts

25 Aug 2017 7:44pm
Apparently someone worked out the circumference of the earth 2200 years ago.

actiomax
actiomax

NSW

1576 posts

25 Aug 2017 8:35pm
Its true that they used a base 60 .
After all its were we get our measurements of time from .
But nothing can take away from Pythagoras doing it in fractions.

My thoughts .
I use trigonometry daily.
Its fun .
cisco
cisco

QLD

12364 posts

26 Aug 2017 12:48am
Adriano, it seems you wish to dispute the origin of all knowledge.

The fact that the square of the hypotenuse of a right angled equals the sum of the square of the other two sides is generally accepted as having been revealed and proven by Pythagoras.

Would it sit better with you if his name was Adriano, Antonio, Bernado, Donato, Guiseppe, Pietro, Abdul, Ali, Ahbud, Mustafa or Muhammed or heaven forbid Jacob or Issac??

What are you prattling on about??
cisco
cisco

QLD

12364 posts

26 Aug 2017 12:55am
Select to expand quote
Adriano said..
The Babs knew about the right angled triangle theorem (previously credited to Pythagoras) and made the world's first trig tablet.



Hang on, you are saying the Babs knew about it and that it was previously credited to Pythagoras meaning that Pythagoras predated the Babs.

Yeah, OK. I have had a few beers and rums tonight too.
Adriano
Adriano

11206 posts

26 Aug 2017 5:54am
Cisco, if you're going to be like that, take it to heavy weather.

I was just sharing a new discovery about math. Please, there is no need to make this personal.

This discovery demonstrates that Pythagoras didn't reveal the theorem at all, but that he proved it using fractions. Who knows, maybe a line of research could look into whether Pythagoras knew about the Babylonian trigonometry and adopted the knowledge and furthered it with fractions.

The Babylonians proved it 1000 years earlier with trigonometry. The question now, is what did the Babylonians use this knowledge for?

It is the world's oldest trigonometric table. A table suggests the knowledge may have been used as a reference document, perhaps in construction or design.

Whether it's commonly accepted that Pythagoras discovered this or not is not the point. He was not the first. History has been re-written.
cisco
cisco

QLD

12364 posts

26 Aug 2017 10:36am
Seems reasonable.
Adriano
Adriano

11206 posts

26 Aug 2017 10:32am
I thought so too. That's better than thinking everything has an agenda....
Jupiter
Jupiter

2156 posts

26 Aug 2017 10:53am
Select to expand quote
cisco said..

Hang on, you are saying the Babs knew about it and that it was previously credited to Pythagoras meaning that Pythagoras predated the Babs.

Yeah, OK. I have had a few beers and rums tonight too.


Are you having a go at Adriano, or are you pissed off because there were someone way before Pythagoras who found an "alternative" way to work out the same problem ?

If it is the former, then it is personal, innit ? If it is the latter, then you forgot that there are many ways to arrive at a solution. But it may take a very different paradigm, or system. But then, being a master navigator and a proud owner of a HUGE yacht, you always know best.
Jupiter
Jupiter

2156 posts

26 Aug 2017 11:00am
Quite an achievement ! But then it involved a very different way to count. The decimal system is easy to deal with. 10 mm to a cm. 100 cents to a dollar, and not the 12 inches to a foot, and then you have to work out the 1/8, 1/16. Quite a pain.

With 60 being the base, that can be painful for the day to day applications.

I use triangles quite a bit to work out lengths and sizes. I often thought there should be an easier way to not have to work out the square roots. Without a calculator those ancient craftsmen will have to find ways to overcome such a handicap. Good on them. I like it a lot !
Adriano
Adriano

11206 posts

26 Aug 2017 11:05am
Yeah 60 is a nuisance for the day-to-day, but has other interesting applications.
cisco
cisco

QLD

12364 posts

26 Aug 2017 9:24pm
Select to expand quote
Jupiter said..
But then, being a master navigator and a proud owner of a HUGE yacht, you always know best.


None of the above. Just a little 30 footer and only went to Master V and MED I and sensible enough to know that I don't know what I don't know.
Adriano
Adriano

11206 posts

26 Aug 2017 7:30pm
Ahh you mean those known unknowns and unknown unknowns like Donald Rumsfeld talked about?

The big scary exploding ones that were a threat to humanity around Baghdad and Tikrit even though it was unknown if they were unknown unknowns or known unknowns or known knowns?

evlPanda
evlPanda

NSW

9207 posts

28 Aug 2017 11:29am
Select to expand quote
Adriano said..
... and more important, were able to avoid fractions by using base 60 rather than decimals.




Oh yeah?

What's 1/3 + 2/3 in sexagesimal (or decimal)?
Poida
Poida

WA

1922 posts

28 Aug 2017 11:35am
the babs probably had plum bobs, levels and string lines to work with for building. nothing else needed for triangles
JulianRoss
JulianRoss

WA

544 posts

28 Aug 2017 1:33pm
.... so back to the maths, where does the Chinese abacus fit into the history of calculation?
End of posts
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site