Now is the good time to test theory/ concept and make the prediction.
Some years ago a concept says that big flood in Australia may cause earthquake nearby.
Most likely New Zealand, (Christchurch again ?).A big mass of water deposited on our land now may press on the tectonic plate. So let's wait few weeks and test this concept.
Now if theory confirms itself We in Australia:
May feel a bit guilty because our land contribute to somebody else problem (-)
On another hand, we could help them to predict event and prepare for that earlier (+)
They will possibly pay us back because big tsunami from their earthquake may hit our shores soon after (-)
Select to expand quoteok said..
so if china builds a heap of sky scrapers in a small time period the same thing?
If you meet the same criteria as we have here, why not?
1) Build your 1,000,000,0000,0000 skyscrapers
2) over one night
3) from material shipped by sea or air from overseas ( could be from Australia).
Possibly if they could buy all our iron ore and coal resources, and ship in one day, an effect will be similar.
That is hypothesis only, just to be tested.
But what I could assure you that:
If Chinese could buy all our natural gas resources, ship all in liquid form to their shores in one day, then by mistake ignite, all hell happen at once: Earthquake that shakes the whole planet, the tsunami that will circumnavigate globe few times, flood that possibly inundate Tibetan upland.
I don't no about earthquakes but a few weeks before yasi, Ayr was hit with a small cyclone, those few weeks were hot and vary humid in Townsville.
The next few weeks of weather will be worth watching!
And the big quake up here was 2011. They only did that to keep up with the cool kids though...
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said..
And the big quake up here was 2011. They only did that to keep up with the cool kids though...
Yep, I remember this too
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..
Facts a few years ago.
Pure coincidence (?)
by the end April we should know ...
So what are your comments about the September earthquake in Christchurch?
Der on dont have anything on that to prove my point.
what a load of bollocks.
I guess you do have a point. Imagine the earth is flat, as P_Mac said so. Too much weight on a flat sheet will soon overload it causes it to buckle. Time for P_Mac to elaborate on this highly techinical issue further, I reckon...
Select to expand quoteTonz said..
So what are your comments about the September earthquake in Christchurch?
That is easy. By September all water from Queensland dried out. So the tectonic plate bounced back 
That works also well for flat PM 33 earth model.
Obviously, somebody (Tonz ?) may come with more scientific reasons for frequent quakes in NZ.
Like a suddenly synchronized movement of all ships in one direction in whole NZ.
Haka done on the exact day in all marae at the same time, make shake the ground too.
There is also the artificial reason for earthquakes besides natural processes.
Two candidates come to mind:
2. The Russians. You can blame them for almost everything recently. From presidential election to spots on the Sun, and famine in Afrika.Why not recall Russia generator and accuse them straight for every earthquake, then claim damages money.
1. Nicola Tesla that invented the machine a century ago. We hear more and more about Tesla recently so maybe the US already weaponized Tesla invention or Elon Musk is hiding something fishy in his electric cars (?)
Now I have an ingenious idea! Kiwis should buy one of those machines from Russians and run in reverse / opposite direction.
so now instead creating should actually calm earth quake
homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/~earpwjg/PG_EN/Mypdfs/How%20to%20make%20artificial%20earthquakes_EN_Full.pdf
Shifu - gold...
The science - can't say I've seen anything to do with continental rebound after flooding in any earth science literature... flooding is a very short-lived event and the mass loading is very small... OTH, rebound after glacial unloading is known as glacial isostasy.
sorry lost myself for a bit there... of course it happens... the earth expands due to anthropogenic-carbon induced global warming... this expansion is non-uniform as the earth is a disk earth theory... strapped to a space tortoise... 0.5 m of rain accumulating in thicknesses of up to 20 m makes a huge difference on this 1 m thick disk - if you don't believe me, just dig a hole deeper than 1 m and you'll see out the bottom (not your own bottom
)... if after 1 m you can't see out the bottom, get an imperial telescope and you soon will...
Select to expand quotePugwash said..
...the mass loading is very small...
sorry lost myself
Nobody knows exactly how much rainfall on our land, but if we assume that only half of Queensland accepted 200mm falls
Queensland 1.853 million km? /2
that will be around 370,600,000,000 tons of fresh water arriving at us suddenly/recently.
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..Pugwash said..
...the mass loading is very small...
sorry lost myself
Nobody knows exactly how much rainfall on our land, but if we assume that only half of Queensland accepted 200mm falls
Queensland 1.853 million km? /2
that will be around 370,600,000,000 tons of fresh water arriving at us suddenly/recently.
Even if 200 mm landed on half of QLD - unlikely if you look at cyclone path... it's still nothing... continental crust is 30 to 50 km thick... and it's 3 times density of water... and that is floating on a whole bunch of dense molten rock. If you believe that stupid "ball earth theory" petermac talks about...
For any type of earthquake, you are going to need enough mass to move a crustal-scale fault...
Select to expand quotePugwash said..
If you believe that stupid "ball earth theory" petermac talks about...
For any type of earthquake, you are going to need enough mass to move a crustal-scale fault...
1. I agree that ball earth theory is complete foolishness ( as oppose to the flat one)
but I can not agree one the second statement.
2.You must know that there is more water inside the earth that outside...
Whole Australia is floating...
If you apply any load at all will sink a bit,
but if water gets inside Australia will fly on the cushion of water vapor. The only answer could be the exact measurement of our surface level: before and after a flood. Going Up or Down. (?)
Scientists discover recently that Earth in no longer ball like or even flat, but square!
Do rain drops on your car make it ride differently? Raindrops on a car have greater mass than the rain water on a continent... relatively speaking...
Earthquakes aren't "imminent", they are happening all the time. If you want to panic over something, there is volcanic activity happening all around a dormant Super Volcano in New Zealand right now...
We are living on an active globe, with near earth objects blazing past in space, we are getting a "close" one on April 19th, its going past at over 120,000 k/ph.
hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=&lang=eng
Sleep well...
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..
Now is the good time to test theory/ concept and make the prediction.
Some years ago a concept says that big flood in Australia may cause earthquake nearby.
Most likely New Zealand, (Christchurch again ?).A big mass of water deposited on our land now may press on the tectonic plate. So let's wait few weeks and test this concept.
Now if theory confirms itself We in Australia:
May feel a bit guilty because our land contribute to somebody else problem (-)
On another hand, we could help them to predict event and prepare for that earlier (+)
They will possibly pay us back because big tsunami from their earthquake may hit our shores soon after (-)
Looks like it may have been proven true.......
